Comparison Overview

CWB Limited

VS

Datz & Datz, P.A.

CWB Limited

Al Falah Street, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi Global Market Square, Tower Al Khatem, Floor 15, HD137, Abu Dhabi, None, AE, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

CWB emerged as an unrivalled super-regional firm in 2023 following the merger of leading intellectual property specialists Cedar White Bradley, PETOŠEVIĆ Group and Hahn & Hahn. With 29 offices, 150 practitioners, and 250 employees, CWB now services and manages the portfolios of some of the world's leading IP owners across 100+ jurisdictions in Africa, Central Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 280
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Datz & Datz, P.A.

6816 Southpoint Pkwy, Suite 101, Jacksonville, Florida, 32216-1700, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Datz & Datz is a highly experienced Jacksonville family law firm concentrating on complex and high-asset divorce law cases. Our team of exceptional divorce law attorneys handle a wide range of cases in the areas of family law. We also handle business law issues and select personal injury cases. The firm’s attorneys are rated AV Preeminent 5 of 5 by their peers in Martingale-Hubbell. The Jacksonville family law firm, led by Lawrence Datz, has a distinguished history. The firm’s partners are two of only four Jacksonville area Fellows of the prestigious American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, and are listed among The Best Lawyers in America as well as among Florida’s Super Lawyers in the family law category.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cwb-limited.jpeg
CWB Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datz-&-datz-p.a..jpeg
Datz & Datz, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CWB Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Datz & Datz, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CWB Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Datz & Datz, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — CWB Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CWB Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Datz & Datz, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datz & Datz, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cwb-limited.jpeg
CWB Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datz-&-datz-p.a..jpeg
Datz & Datz, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CWB Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Datz & Datz, P.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Datz & Datz, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CWB Limited company.

In the current year, Datz & Datz, P.A. company and CWB Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Datz & Datz, P.A. company nor CWB Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Datz & Datz, P.A. company nor CWB Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Datz & Datz, P.A. company nor CWB Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CWB Limited company nor Datz & Datz, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CWB Limited company nor Datz & Datz, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CWB Limited company employs more people globally than Datz & Datz, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CWB Limited nor Datz & Datz, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X