Comparison Overview

CVLUX

VS

Fitzhenry & Whiteside

CVLUX

undefined, Fresno, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cvlux.com

Since launching in 2013, CVLUX has served as a cultural barometer for The Golden State. Accompanying the print publication is the digital interactive platform LUX daily, which provides readers additional content beyond the pages of each edition. The mission of CVLUX is to provide unrivaled content, which inspires and entertains its readers. From headline-making celebrity journalism to the inside of the most exclusive homes and renowned fashion houses, CVLUX inspires the cultural dialogue of today. When you invest in CVLUX, you are choosing a lifestyle, a brand, which represents superiority in print and digital marketing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fitzhenry & Whiteside

195 Allstate Parkway, Markham, Ontario, L3R 4T8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fitzhenry.ca

Fitzhenry & Whiteside is a private limited corporation owned by the Fitzhenry family with over 1,500 titles in print. We publish or reprint, through our group of companies, about 100 titles per annum. The house specializes in history, biography, poetry, sports, photographic books, reference, photography, and children’s and young adult titles.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cv-luxury.jpeg
CVLUX
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzhenry-&-whiteside.jpeg
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CVLUX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CVLUX in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzhenry & Whiteside in 2025.

Incident History — CVLUX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CVLUX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fitzhenry & Whiteside (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzhenry & Whiteside cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cv-luxury.jpeg
CVLUX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzhenry-&-whiteside.jpeg
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CVLUX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fitzhenry & Whiteside company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CVLUX company.

In the current year, Fitzhenry & Whiteside company and CVLUX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor CVLUX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor CVLUX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor CVLUX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CVLUX company nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CVLUX company nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fitzhenry & Whiteside company employs more people globally than CVLUX company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CVLUX nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References