Comparison Overview

Custom Logo USA

VS

OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group

Custom Logo USA

7152 State Fair Blvd, Syracuse, NY 13209, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Custom Logo USA is a national provider of custom shirt designs and apparel. Custom Logo USA also offers cost-conscious, effective promotional products. Our inventory also includes custom dry fit shirts and other custom performance shirts. Our custom t shirts have satisfied the needs of businesses, bands, sports teams at every level and many more. Order online at customlogousa.com and get free shipping and rush service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group

55 Gelderd Road, Leeds, LS12 6TG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The OPM (Labels & Packaging) Group manufactures Labels & flexible packaging. Quality, service and innovation define OPM. OPM offer consistent and Reliable Product Quality, Short Lead-Times / Speed-to-Market, Prompt, Responsive Service with a dedicated customer support team. Fully equipped Esko Studio for artwork and repro file preparation with GMG proofing. A secure “smart” site with automated workflows, provides Full Traceability and Validation of Raw Material and Product. Within a framework of Total Quality Management, all of our products are produced to ISO9001:2015, BRCGS Global Packaging Materials Standard Grade AA+, ISO14001:2015 and PS9000:2016. All products are printed in a dedicated low migration/ food safe site following GMP Standards. OPM know how to get the look you want and how to help your product compete at retail. OPM know how to select the best materials to ensure that your packaging performs on your production lines, during shipping, at retail, and after the consumer takes it home. We do this through understanding your markets and challenges, delivering innovation and new insights for your packaging to succeed. Key products: Labels Security, Authenticity & Tamper Evident Labels, Peel and Reseal , Braille & Tactile Warning Labels, Multi-ply Peel and Reveal Labels , Sequentially Numbered, Thermo chromic Labels Decorative Features - Scented, Glow in the dark, Silk screen, Cold Foil, Hot Foil ,Holographic Flexible Packaging products for a variety of applications to exacting standards providing : Lidding Films and High Grade Papers, Laminated Films , Flow Wraps (foil & non foil), Blister Foils Wet Wipe Wraps, Liquid Pouches, Stick Pack , High Barrier Laminations, Laminated Sachets (Ideal for single dose products) Key markets: Pharmaceutical, Beauty & Cosmetic, Home & Personal Care, Healthcare & Fitness, Vets & Pets, Automotive, Horticulture, Food & Beverage.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 70
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opm-group-labelsandpackaging.jpeg
OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Custom Logo USA
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Custom Logo USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group in 2025.

Incident History — Custom Logo USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Custom Logo USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/custom-logo-usa.jpeg
Custom Logo USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opm-group-labelsandpackaging.jpeg
OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Custom Logo USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Custom Logo USA company.

In the current year, OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company and Custom Logo USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company nor Custom Logo USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company nor Custom Logo USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company nor Custom Logo USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Custom Logo USA company nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Custom Logo USA company nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group company employs more people globally than Custom Logo USA company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Custom Logo USA nor OPM (Labels and Packaging) Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L