Comparison Overview

Custom Label

VS

Brightformat

Custom Label

7800 Patterson Pass Rd, Livermore, California, US, 94550
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Our mission revolves around helping businesses build their brand - one custom label at a time. For nearly 50 years, we have stayed at the leading edge of printing technology to provide creative solutions for the labeling and packaging needs of businesses within different market segments. With our flexographic and digital printing capabilities, we curate customized labels, tags, cartons, and sleeves perfectly fitting for the unique demands of every business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brightformat

5300 Corporate Grove SE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49512, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Brightformat, we have taken the conventional model for a printing company and made it relevant in today's world. As specialized experts in high-quality digital printing and direct mail, we have built our business on the simple yet often overlooked belief that there is nothing more important than the success of our clients. We group our services into five categories: environmental graphics, event graphics, retail graphics, marketing materials, and direct mail. Those categories are helpful as a starting point, but the way we think about projects is a lot more flexible. We often find solutions others can’t by bringing techniques and ideas from one category to another—using all the tools at our disposal to bring projects to life. Our company is sharp, colorful, service-oriented, and forward-thinking in all things graphic arts. We work with superheroes, you should too. Thank you for joining us. Brightformat was founded originally in 1988 as Diversified Data Services by current co-owner Mike Glupker. It began as a company offering mailing list services to clients and has grown and evolved into a digital printing, direct mail and marketing firm with an excellent reputation for quality and service. Current wonder twins--and co-owners since 2008, Pete Houlihan and Mike Glupker recently changed the name to Brightformat because they wanted it to more accurately reflect their commitment to smart, colorful service and their passion for all things Graphic Arts.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/custom-label-&-decal-llc.jpeg
Custom Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightformat.jpeg
Brightformat
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Custom Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brightformat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Custom Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brightformat in 2025.

Incident History — Custom Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Custom Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brightformat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brightformat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/custom-label-&-decal-llc.jpeg
Custom Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightformat.jpeg
Brightformat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Custom Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brightformat company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brightformat company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Custom Label company.

In the current year, Brightformat company and Custom Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brightformat company nor Custom Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brightformat company nor Custom Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brightformat company nor Custom Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Custom Label company nor Brightformat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Custom Label company nor Brightformat company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Custom Label company employs more people globally than Brightformat company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Custom Label nor Brightformat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L