Comparison Overview

Custom Color, A GSP Company

VS

Alternativa Flexo

Custom Color, A GSP Company

14320 W 101st Terrace, Lenexa, Kansas, 66215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1969 as a photography processing studio, Custom Color, a GSP Company, has become a leader in graphics production over the past 50 years. The Kansas City-based operation runs as a full-service, digital printing company known for innovation and quality. With best-in-class technology and experienced leadership, Custom Color supplies graphics to leading consumer and retail brands throughout the United States.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alternativa Flexo

Estrada Tang Wing Sun 151, Piracicaba, 13426-425, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Com mais de 15 anos de experiência no mercado de impressão flexográfica, atualmente somos uma das maiores empresas do ramo no Brasil. Especializada na comercialização de máquinas, equipamentos, insumos e produtos para indústria de embalagem e impressão gráfica. Importamos dos Estados Unidos e Europa, os melhores produtos e a mais avançada tecnologia, para satisfação de nossos clientes. Oferecemos soluções que agregam valor, reduzindo desperdícios, aumentando a vida útil, incrementando a produtividade e melhorando o ambiente de trabalho.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/custom-color-corp.jpeg
Custom Color, A GSP Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alternativaflexo.jpeg
Alternativa Flexo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Custom Color, A GSP Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alternativa Flexo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Custom Color, A GSP Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alternativa Flexo in 2025.

Incident History — Custom Color, A GSP Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Custom Color, A GSP Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alternativa Flexo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alternativa Flexo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/custom-color-corp.jpeg
Custom Color, A GSP Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alternativaflexo.jpeg
Alternativa Flexo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Custom Color, A GSP Company company and Alternativa Flexo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alternativa Flexo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Custom Color, A GSP Company company.

In the current year, Alternativa Flexo company and Custom Color, A GSP Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alternativa Flexo company nor Custom Color, A GSP Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alternativa Flexo company nor Custom Color, A GSP Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alternativa Flexo company nor Custom Color, A GSP Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company company nor Alternativa Flexo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company company nor Alternativa Flexo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Custom Color, A GSP Company company employs more people globally than Alternativa Flexo company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Custom Color, A GSP Company nor Alternativa Flexo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N