Comparison Overview

Curzon Promotional Graphics

VS

Echelon Fine Printing

Curzon Promotional Graphics

1013 S 75th Street, Omaha, NE, 68114, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.curzongraphics.com

Custom graphic designer & manufacturer of promotional products utilizing screen or digital printing. Products include banners, interior/exterior permanent signs, yard signs, vehicle wraps, floor graphics, static clings, magnets, decals & backlit signs. In- house design team can help create advertising strategy. Die cutting, drilling, trimming, sewing, grommeting, mounting, laminating, routing, hardware & heat bending finishing services & fulfillment services available as well. Serves retail, beverage, automotive, grocery, manufacturing, restaurant, discount center, fast food & agricultural industries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Echelon Fine Printing

4909 Alcoa Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90058, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://EchelonPrint.com

Echelon Fine Printing is one of the world’s largest engraving companies and one of the world’s largest small-format commercial printers. Formed by the merger of three highly acclaimed, award-winning, Taylor Corporation subsidiaries - BurdgeCooper, Complete Graphics, and The Ligature we are able to create fine print and business stationery of exceptional quality. With over 100 years’ experience, 156 artisans, a national footprint with robust production capabilities, competitive pricing and more we are devoted to making our clients job a little easier. We are a place of distinction, where expertise and client relationships come together. Locations: Chicago, IL Berkeley, CA Los Angeles, CA Minneapolis, MN

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curzon-promotional-graphics.jpeg
Curzon Promotional Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echelonfp.jpeg
Echelon Fine Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Curzon Promotional Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Echelon Fine Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Curzon Promotional Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Echelon Fine Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Curzon Promotional Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Curzon Promotional Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Echelon Fine Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Echelon Fine Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curzon-promotional-graphics.jpeg
Curzon Promotional Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echelonfp.jpeg
Echelon Fine Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Curzon Promotional Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Echelon Fine Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Echelon Fine Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Curzon Promotional Graphics company.

In the current year, Echelon Fine Printing company and Curzon Promotional Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Echelon Fine Printing company nor Curzon Promotional Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Echelon Fine Printing company nor Curzon Promotional Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Echelon Fine Printing company nor Curzon Promotional Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics company nor Echelon Fine Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics company nor Echelon Fine Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Echelon Fine Printing company employs more people globally than Curzon Promotional Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Curzon Promotional Graphics nor Echelon Fine Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References