Comparison Overview

Curtis Law Firm

VS

Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers

Curtis Law Firm

11160 C1 South Lakes Dr., Reston, VA, 20191, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Curtis Law Firm, PLLC. provides business and immigration counseling services to companies nationwide. We have expertise in employment based immigration, technology law, contracts, and many other general business areas. We provide numerous fixed fee rate plans that allow companies to save money and budget more effectively while still receiving high level legal counseling.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers

Mowbray House, Castle Meadow Road, Nottinghamshire, NG2 1BJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Private and public sector legal experts, offering clear opinions and straightforward legal advice, whenever and wherever you need it - locally, nationally and internationally. Complex problems - understood, explained and resolved by a single team, across five offices nationally, working together in long term partnership with you - a genuinely different approach. Exceptional service, every time, from experts you trust and costs that reflect what you value in a law firm, not the things you don’t. A place where people want to work and a business actively engaged with our communities and the environment. Sometimes you just need a lawyer, but you’ll want to do business with us.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curtis-law-firm.jpeg
Curtis Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brownejinhouselawyers.jpeg
Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Curtis Law Firm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Curtis Law Firm in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Curtis Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Curtis Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curtis-law-firm.jpeg
Curtis Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brownejinhouselawyers.jpeg
Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Curtis Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Curtis Law Firm company.

In the current year, Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company and Curtis Law Firm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company nor Curtis Law Firm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company nor Curtis Law Firm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company nor Curtis Law Firm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Curtis Law Firm company nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Curtis Law Firm company.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Curtis Law Firm nor Browne Jacobson In-House Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X