Comparison Overview

Cultural Safeguard Alliance

VS

Andrew Low House Museum

Cultural Safeguard Alliance

470 James Street, Suite 007, New Haven, Connecticut, US, 06513
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Cultural Safeguard Alliance is a non-profit premier network dedicated to the protection and celebration of cultural heritage. As a free network with a complimentary platform, including validated memberships, we cater to the unique needs of operations, safety, and security professionals. The Cultural Safeguard Alliance encompasses a wide variety of cultural institutions such as museums, libraries, botanical gardens, aquariums, zoos, performance arts centers, historic sites, science centers, and beyond. Our Vision: We envision a world where every cultural treasure is preserved and respected for its historical significance. Our experts collaborate with cultural institutions globally to foster the implementation of top-tier strategies and best practices from the American Alliance of Museums and the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Our Commitment: We are dedicated to the dual goal of preserving cultural legacies and building a robust network of professionals in cultural institutions, including operations, safety, and security. We keep our fingers on the pulse of real-time incidents, and we're all about nurturing collaboration and the exchange of knowledge among our members. Our Endeavor: By sharing the latest in policies, procedures, and logistical strategies, we aim to amplify the impact of cultural property protection. Only through our collective efforts can we ensure the enduring legacy of our cultural heritage. Join Today: Embrace the opportunity to be part of a network that values the richness and diversity of our shared past. Together, let's champion the cause of cultural safeguarding for the enjoyment and education of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Andrew Low House Museum

329 Abercorn St, Savannah, Georgia, US, 31401-4634
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Andrew Low House is a Greek and Italianate Revival- style house museum with historic gardens in the heart of Savannah's National Historic Landmark District that was built in 1848, by New York architect, John Norris. The museum and gift shop welcomes visitors seven days a week, running tours and special events daily. The museum has a collection of painting, furniture, silver, and glass which provides a visual reference to how people lived and worked in mid-19th-century Savannah. Hear fascinating stories about the generations of people related to this site from Andrew Low, the first owner of the house, Girl Scout founder Juliette "Daisy"​ Gordon Low, enslaved and free servants of the Low family, Robert E. Lee, and English writer William Makepeace Thackeray, who declared in 1856 that the house was "the most comfortable quarters I have ever had in the United States."​ In the 20th century, the Andrew Low House evolved from a home to the headquarters for The National Society of The Colonial Dames of America in the State of Georgia, and is now an important historic house museum that gives life to local, national, and international history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culturalsafeguardalliance.jpeg
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrew-low-house.jpeg
Andrew Low House Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Andrew Low House Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cultural Safeguard Alliance in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andrew Low House Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Cultural Safeguard Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cultural Safeguard Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Andrew Low House Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andrew Low House Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culturalsafeguardalliance.jpeg
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrew-low-house.jpeg
Andrew Low House Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Andrew Low House Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cultural Safeguard Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Andrew Low House Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cultural Safeguard Alliance company.

In the current year, Andrew Low House Museum company and Cultural Safeguard Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Andrew Low House Museum company nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Andrew Low House Museum company nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Andrew Low House Museum company nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance company nor Andrew Low House Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance company nor Andrew Low House Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Andrew Low House Museum company employs more people globally than Cultural Safeguard Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance nor Andrew Low House Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X