Comparison Overview

Cultural Innovations

VS

Stedelijk Museum Breda

Cultural Innovations

1-2 Hatfields, London, undefined, SE1 9PG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

We are a multi-disciplinary team of designers, museum professionals, strategists and creative thinkers. Based in London, we work with museums, visitor attractions, science centres and heritage sites across the globe, helping them to find the right solutions for their locations and audiences. Our services start at the very outset of a project when we work with our clients to examine market context and feasibility, define objectives, analyse audiences and plan the experiences we would like them to have. Our interpretation and design teams create visitor experiences that are powerful, entertaining, thought-provoking and memorable. From initial concept through detailed design to visitor operations, we work on all project phases to ensure the final outcome is as extraordinary as it can be. Over the past 16 years we have worked in more than 30 countries, producing world-class results for our clients and their audiences. In achieving this, we are committed to creative collaboration, knowledge-sharing and understanding local contexts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stedelijk Museum Breda

Boschstraat 22, Breda, 4811, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Stedelijk Museum Breda is the museum for cultural legacy and history of the city of Breda and for contemporary visual culture. Our key concepts are perception and imagination, attention and connection. We look to the world with wonder and ask the visitor: what triggers your imagination? We believe that careful observation is the source of knowledge, inspiration and pleasure. In all we do, we reach out to partners within and outside the city.​ Stedelijk Museum Breda opened its doors at Boschstraat June 17th, 2017.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cultural-innovations.jpeg
Cultural Innovations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stedelijk-museum-breda.jpeg
Stedelijk Museum Breda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cultural Innovations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stedelijk Museum Breda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cultural Innovations in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stedelijk Museum Breda in 2025.

Incident History — Cultural Innovations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cultural Innovations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stedelijk Museum Breda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stedelijk Museum Breda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cultural-innovations.jpeg
Cultural Innovations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stedelijk-museum-breda.jpeg
Stedelijk Museum Breda
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stedelijk Museum Breda company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cultural Innovations company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stedelijk Museum Breda company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cultural Innovations company.

In the current year, Stedelijk Museum Breda company and Cultural Innovations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stedelijk Museum Breda company nor Cultural Innovations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stedelijk Museum Breda company nor Cultural Innovations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stedelijk Museum Breda company nor Cultural Innovations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cultural Innovations company nor Stedelijk Museum Breda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cultural Innovations company nor Stedelijk Museum Breda company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stedelijk Museum Breda company employs more people globally than Cultural Innovations company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cultural Innovations nor Stedelijk Museum Breda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X