Comparison Overview

University of Colorado Boulder

VS

Northeastern University

University of Colorado Boulder

914 Broadway St, Boulder, Colorado, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

As the flagship university of the state of Colorado, CU Boulder is a dynamic community of scholars and learners situated on one of the most spectacular college campuses in the country.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,137
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Northeastern University

360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115-5005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1898, Northeastern is a global research university with a distinctive, experience-driven approach to education and discovery. The university is a leader in experiential learning, powered by the world’s most far-reaching cooperative education program. We integrate classroom study with opportunities for professional work, research, service, and global learning in more than 100 countries. The same spirit of collaboration guides a use-inspired research enterprise focused on solving global challenges in health, security, and sustainability. Northeastern offers a comprehensive array of undergraduate and graduate programs leading to degrees through the doctorate in nine colleges and schools, and select graduate programs at campuses in Boston, Charlotte, N.C., San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, and Toronto. Campuses in Burlington, MA, and Nahant, MA, are home to research institutes for homeland security and coastal sustainability, respectively.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,923
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cuboulder.jpeg
University of Colorado Boulder
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northeastern-university.jpeg
Northeastern University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Colorado Boulder
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Northeastern University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Colorado Boulder in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northeastern University in 2025.

Incident History — University of Colorado Boulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Colorado Boulder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Northeastern University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northeastern University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cuboulder.jpeg
University of Colorado Boulder
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northeastern-university.jpeg
Northeastern University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Northeastern University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Colorado Boulder company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Colorado Boulder company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Northeastern University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Northeastern University company and University of Colorado Boulder company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Northeastern University company nor University of Colorado Boulder company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

University of Colorado Boulder company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Northeastern University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Northeastern University company nor University of Colorado Boulder company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder company nor Northeastern University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Colorado Boulder company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Northeastern University company.

Northeastern University company employs more people globally than University of Colorado Boulder company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Colorado Boulder nor Northeastern University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H