Comparison Overview

CTF Services Limited

VS

Danske Bank

CTF Services Limited

21/F, NCB Innovation Centre, 888 Lai Chi Kok Road Cheung Sha Wan, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, CTF Services Limited (Hong Kong Stock Code: 659) is a conglomerate with a diversified portfolio of market-leading businesses, predominantly in Hong Kong and the Mainland. The Group’s businesses include toll roads, construction, insurance, logistics and facilities management. Through the Group’s sustainable business model, it is committed to creating more value for all stakeholders and the community.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Danske Bank

Bernstorffsgade 40, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, 1577, DK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Danske Bank – A driver of growth and development For more than a 150 years, Danske Bank has strived to be a driver of growth and development in society. We have developed in tandem with the societies we are part of, and our advisory services, expertise and financial solutions have helped individuals, families, businesses and organisations to realise their ambitions and potential. With long-term sustainable development as our ambition, we will continue to work every day to be the best possible bank, for the benefit of our customers, employees, shareholders and the societies we are part of. Follow us for relevant content and insights You will receive the latest news, insights and information that can inspire and help you with your everyday financial needs. On our company page, you can also read more about life as an employee at Danske Bank and be sure to check our current job openings if you are interested in joining our international community of 22,000 people and help us build an even more innovative, agile and truly customer-centric culture.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,223
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ctfservices.jpeg
CTF Services Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danskebank.jpeg
Danske Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CTF Services Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danske Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CTF Services Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danske Bank in 2025.

Incident History — CTF Services Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CTF Services Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danske Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danske Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ctfservices.jpeg
CTF Services Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danskebank.jpeg
Danske Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Danske Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CTF Services Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Danske Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CTF Services Limited company.

In the current year, Danske Bank company and CTF Services Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Danske Bank company nor CTF Services Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danske Bank company nor CTF Services Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Danske Bank company nor CTF Services Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CTF Services Limited company nor Danske Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danske Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CTF Services Limited company.

Danske Bank company employs more people globally than CTF Services Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CTF Services Limited nor Danske Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N