Comparison Overview

CT Association for Community Action

VS

Lyciar

CT Association for Community Action

US, 06053
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CAFCA's members, Connecticut's 12 Community Action Agencies, continually strive to reduce the conditions of poverty through the identification and removal of social and economic barriers, the mobilization of community resources, advocacy, and the provision of direct services at the community level in all of the state's 169 cities and towns through cost-effective and community-based processes.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lyciar

Murtala Courts, Kampala, UG
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

How do we analyse infrastructure investment? Step back. Look at the policy space. It is a dynamical system comprising the state, society and market (SSM). Focus on Africa: Within this SSM space, infrastructure investment is tethered to debt and the potential in public-private partnerships (PPP). These three define our work. We study the dynamics of the three, and the excitation of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR). We work with universities in Africa and overseas. That rigour of pursuit guides our advice to governments, funding and financing entities, and asset managers.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CT Association for Community Action
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyciar.jpeg
Lyciar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CT Association for Community Action
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lyciar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CT Association for Community Action in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyciar in 2025.

Incident History — CT Association for Community Action (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CT Association for Community Action cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lyciar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyciar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CT Association for Community Action
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyciar.jpeg
Lyciar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyciar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CT Association for Community Action company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lyciar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CT Association for Community Action company.

In the current year, Lyciar company and CT Association for Community Action company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lyciar company nor CT Association for Community Action company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lyciar company nor CT Association for Community Action company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lyciar company nor CT Association for Community Action company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CT Association for Community Action company nor Lyciar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CT Association for Community Action company nor Lyciar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lyciar company employs more people globally than CT Association for Community Action company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CT Association for Community Action nor Lyciar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H