Comparison Overview

CSL Publishing

VS

The Dartmouth Review

CSL Publishing

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

A UK based publisher of marine and automotive brands across both print and digital platforms. Primarily working from our head office in Cambridge, they are committed to providing informed content across their stable and work hard to develop a team of leading industry experts who possess extensive knowledge and expertise of their chosen fields.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Dartmouth Review

32 S Main Street, Hanover, 03755, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Hanover Review is the 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation that publishes The Dartmouth Review, Dartmouth's only independent student publication.Founded in 1980 by a number of staffers from the College’s daily newspaper, it quickly rose to national prominence for its coverage of campus social issues and the provocative political positions it has sometimes adopted. Although the paper has frequently been praised for the quality of its writing– most recently by Dartmouth’s 17th President, Jim Yong Kim – it is perhaps most famous for having spawned a movement of politically conservative U.S. college newspapers that would come to include The Yale Free Press, The Stanford Review, The Harvard Salient, The California Review, The Princeton Tory, and The Cornell Review. The Dartmouth Review has also had a profound impact on the national conservative movement as a whole. Past staffers have gone on to occupy prominent positions in the Reagan and Bush Administrations, write for a number of leading publications, and author best-selling political works. Some of the most famous include Pulitzer-Prize-winner Joseph Rago of The Wall Street Journal, The New Criterion’s James Panero, author Dinesh D’Souza, talk-show host Laura Ingraham, The Wall Street Journal’s Hugo Restall, and Hoover Institute research fellow, Peter Robinson. Author, columnist, and former Nixon and Reagan speechwriter, Jeffrey Hart, was also instrumental in The Review’s founding and is a long-time board member and advisor. As of 2018, the paper has 10,000 off-campus subscribers, distributes a further 4,000 newspapers on campus, and claims 80,000 unique viewers per month on its website. It also has a large social media presence and has generated a substantial Twitter and Facebook following with its frequent tweets and posts.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csl-publishing.jpeg
CSL Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hanover-review.jpeg
The Dartmouth Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CSL Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Dartmouth Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSL Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dartmouth Review in 2025.

Incident History — CSL Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSL Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Dartmouth Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dartmouth Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csl-publishing.jpeg
CSL Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hanover-review.jpeg
The Dartmouth Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CSL Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Dartmouth Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Dartmouth Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CSL Publishing company.

In the current year, The Dartmouth Review company and CSL Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Dartmouth Review company nor CSL Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Dartmouth Review company nor CSL Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Dartmouth Review company nor CSL Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CSL Publishing company nor The Dartmouth Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CSL Publishing company nor The Dartmouth Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Dartmouth Review company employs more people globally than CSL Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CSL Publishing nor The Dartmouth Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.