Comparison Overview

CSEA Local 1000

VS

Council for the Welfare of Children

CSEA Local 1000

143 Washington Ave, Albany, New York, 12210, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://cseany.org

The Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA) is one of the largest and most influential unions in New York and the United States. CSEA has about 300,000 members and represents state, county, municipal, school district, child care, and private sector employees. Formed in 1910, CSEA has improved the lives of hardworking New Yorkers for more than 100 years, and is the largest affiliate of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Council for the Welfare of Children

#10 Apo St., Sta. Teresita, Quezon City, 1114, PH
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749
http://cwc.gov.ph

The Council for the Welfare of Children is the focal inter-agency body of the Philippine Government for children. It is mandated to coordinate the implementation and enforcement of all laws; formulate, monitor and evaluate policies, programs and measures for children. Providing dynamic leadership in ensuring a child-friendly and child-sensitive society where every child fully enjoys his/her rights.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csea-local-1000.jpeg
CSEA Local 1000
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-the-welfare-of-children.jpeg
Council for the Welfare of Children
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CSEA Local 1000
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Council for the Welfare of Children
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSEA Local 1000 in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council for the Welfare of Children in 2025.

Incident History — CSEA Local 1000 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSEA Local 1000 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Council for the Welfare of Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council for the Welfare of Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csea-local-1000.jpeg
CSEA Local 1000
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-the-welfare-of-children.jpeg
Council for the Welfare of Children
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Council for the Welfare of Children company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CSEA Local 1000 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Council for the Welfare of Children company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CSEA Local 1000 company.

In the current year, Council for the Welfare of Children company and CSEA Local 1000 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Council for the Welfare of Children company nor CSEA Local 1000 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Council for the Welfare of Children company nor CSEA Local 1000 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Council for the Welfare of Children company nor CSEA Local 1000 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 company nor Council for the Welfare of Children company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 company nor Council for the Welfare of Children company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CSEA Local 1000 company employs more people globally than Council for the Welfare of Children company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CSEA Local 1000 nor Council for the Welfare of Children holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References