Comparison Overview

CS Automation

VS

In Control Inc.

CS Automation

6319 Dean Parkway, Ontario, NY, 14519, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

CS Automation is a solution provider and distributor for world-class manufacturers of industrial automation products. We focus on Machine Control, Pneumatic Automation, Electric Actuators, Robotics, Motion Control, Machine Framing, and Machine Safeguarding. We offer a high level of technical support for the disciplines that we promote. We have a well-trained Sales Staff along with several Application Engineers to help our customers specify and implement cost effective and efficient solutions. We are very skilled at building higher level sub-assemblies for many customers using our core products in all segments of manufacturing including medical, automated assembly, food processing, printing, packaging, process control and electronic assembly.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

In Control Inc.

5301 E River Rd, Fridley, 55421, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1993, In Control has always had a deep commitment to customer satisfaction. It is our north star, which is why our customers keep coming back for future projects. We make controls intuitive and dependable for industrial plants, water and wastewater facilities, and utility infrastructure. As a result, we have grown over time to the respected company we are today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cs-automation.jpeg
CS Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-ctrl.jpeg
In Control Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CS Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
In Control Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CS Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for In Control Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — CS Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CS Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — In Control Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

In Control Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cs-automation.jpeg
CS Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-ctrl.jpeg
In Control Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

In Control Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CS Automation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, In Control Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CS Automation company.

In the current year, In Control Inc. company and CS Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither In Control Inc. company nor CS Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither In Control Inc. company nor CS Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither In Control Inc. company nor CS Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CS Automation company nor In Control Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CS Automation company nor In Control Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

In Control Inc. company employs more people globally than CS Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CS Automation nor In Control Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H