Comparison Overview

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

VS

Societe Generale

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

4, Rue Frédéric-Guillaume Raiffeisen, Strasbourg, Grand Est, FR, 67000
Last Update: 2026-01-19

Bancassureur de premier plan en France avec 79 000 collaborateurs au service de 31 millions de clients, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale propose une offre multiservice à une clientèle de particuliers, de professionnels de proximité et entreprises de toutes tailles, via plus de 4 000 points de vente. Banque coopérative et mutualiste, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe les Caisses de Crédit Mutuel des Fédérations Centre Est Europe (Strasbourg), Sud-Est (Lyon), Ile-de-France (Paris), Savoie-Mont Blanc (Annecy), Midi-Atlantique (Toulouse), Loire-Atlantique et Centre Ouest (Nantes), Centre (Orléans), Normandie (Caen), Dauphiné-Vivarais (Valence), Méditerranéen (Marseille), Anjou (Angers), Massif Central (Clermont-Ferrand), Antilles-Guyane (Fort-de-France) et Nord Europe (Lille). Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe également la Caisse Fédérale de Crédit Mutuel, la Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel (BFCM) et l’ensemble de ses filiales, notamment le CIC, Euro-Information, les Assurances du Crédit Mutuel (ACM), TARGOBANK, Cofidis Group, Beobank, la Banque Européenne du Crédit Mutuel (BECM), Banque de Luxembourg, Banque Transatlantique et Homiris. Au Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, nous valorisons la créativité et l’envie d’entreprendre de nos collaborateurs, au travers de métiers riches et diversifiés permettant à tous les profils de s’épanouir et d’évoluer. Vous souhaitez nous rejoindre ? Retrouvez notre site carrière : https://recrutement.creditmutuel.fr/fr/index.html Découvrez nos autres réseaux sociaux : ➡️ X : https://x.com/CreditMutuelAF ➡️ Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/creditmutuelaf.recrute ➡️ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@creditmutuelalliancefederale

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,553
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Societe Generale

29, boulevard Haussmann, Paris, 75009, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Societe Generale is one of the leading European financial services groups. Based on a diversified and integrated banking model, the Group combines financial strength and proven expertise in innovation with a strategy of sustainable growth. Committed to the positive transformations of the world’s societies and economies, Societe Generale and its teams seek to build, day after day, together with its clients, a better and sustainable future through responsible and innovative financial solutions. Active in the real economy for over 150 years, with a solid position in Europe and connected to the rest of the world, Societe Generale has over 117,000 members of staff in 66 countries and supports on a daily basis 25 million individual clients, businesses and institutional investors around the world by offering a wide range of advisory services and tailored financial solutions. The Group is built on three complementary core businesses: - French Retail Banking which encompasses the SG and Boursorama brands. Each offers a full range of financial services with omnichannel products at the cutting edge of digital innovation; - International Retail Banking, Insurance and Financial Services, with networks in Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and specialised businesses that are leaders in their markets; - Global Banking and Investor Solutions, which offers recognised expertise, key international locations and integrated solutions. Societe Generale is included in the principal socially responsible investment indices: DJSI (Europe), FTSE4Good (Global and Europe), Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index, Refinitiv Diversity and Inclusion Index, Euronext Vigeo (Europe and Eurozone), STOXX Global ESG Leaders indexes, and the MSCI Low Carbon Leaders Index (World and Europe).

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 43,834
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/societe-generale.jpeg
Societe Generale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Societe Generale
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Societe Generale in 2026.

Incident History — Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Societe Generale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Societe Generale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/societe-generale.jpeg
Societe Generale
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2012
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Societe Generale company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Societe Generale company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has not reported any.

In the current year, Societe Generale company and Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Societe Generale company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Societe Generale company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Societe Generale company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company nor Societe Generale company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Societe Generale company.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company employs more people globally than Societe Generale company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Societe Generale holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N