Comparison Overview

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

VS

La Banque Postale

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

4, Rue Frédéric-Guillaume Raiffeisen, Strasbourg, Grand Est, FR, 67000
Last Update: 2026-01-19

Bancassureur de premier plan en France avec 79 000 collaborateurs au service de 31 millions de clients, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale propose une offre multiservice à une clientèle de particuliers, de professionnels de proximité et entreprises de toutes tailles, via plus de 4 000 points de vente. Banque coopérative et mutualiste, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe les Caisses de Crédit Mutuel des Fédérations Centre Est Europe (Strasbourg), Sud-Est (Lyon), Ile-de-France (Paris), Savoie-Mont Blanc (Annecy), Midi-Atlantique (Toulouse), Loire-Atlantique et Centre Ouest (Nantes), Centre (Orléans), Normandie (Caen), Dauphiné-Vivarais (Valence), Méditerranéen (Marseille), Anjou (Angers), Massif Central (Clermont-Ferrand), Antilles-Guyane (Fort-de-France) et Nord Europe (Lille). Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe également la Caisse Fédérale de Crédit Mutuel, la Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel (BFCM) et l’ensemble de ses filiales, notamment le CIC, Euro-Information, les Assurances du Crédit Mutuel (ACM), TARGOBANK, Cofidis Group, Beobank, la Banque Européenne du Crédit Mutuel (BECM), Banque de Luxembourg, Banque Transatlantique et Homiris. Au Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, nous valorisons la créativité et l’envie d’entreprendre de nos collaborateurs, au travers de métiers riches et diversifiés permettant à tous les profils de s’épanouir et d’évoluer. Vous souhaitez nous rejoindre ? Retrouvez notre site carrière : https://recrutement.creditmutuel.fr/fr/index.html Découvrez nos autres réseaux sociaux : ➡️ X : https://x.com/CreditMutuelAF ➡️ Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/creditmutuelaf.recrute ➡️ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@creditmutuelalliancefederale

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,553
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

La Banque Postale

115, rue de Sèvres, Paris, FR, Cedex 06 75275
Last Update: 2026-01-17

La Banque Postale is a ‘bank like no other’ driven by the post office values of local presence and service. As heir to La Poste Financial Services, it is the only bank to have been tasked with a mission to provide access to banking services under the law introduced to modernise the French economy in 2008. Accessible, straightforward, local, transparent, useful, substantial and supportive… La Banque Postale is the bank for everyone : nearly half of the French population has at least one of the Bank’s products. It serves more 10 million active personal customers and 475,000 business customers. More and more customers join La Banque Postale every day, attracted by its commitment to build a long-term relationship with each individual on the basis of sound advice and trust. This trust is earned and strengthened on a day-to-day basis by the Bank’s teams working in post offices, financial centres, subsidiary companies and central services departments. Because it is a ‘bank like no other’, La Banque Postale puts the interest of its customers above all other considerations at the heart of its organisational structure. Being a ‘bank like no other’ means being useful by offering a range of no-frills products and services tailored to meet the essential needs of all customers at affordable prices. It also means supporting everyone in achieving their life goals, offering everyday financial management products and delivering a more comfortable life with real peace of mind.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 20,288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-banque-postale.jpeg
La Banque Postale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
La Banque Postale
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for La Banque Postale in 2026.

Incident History — Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — La Banque Postale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

La Banque Postale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-banque-postale.jpeg
La Banque Postale
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Inondation de requêtes et connexions
Motivation: Perturbation des services critiques, possible motivation géopolitique
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to La Banque Postale company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

La Banque Postale company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has not reported any.

In the current year, La Banque Postale company and Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither La Banque Postale company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither La Banque Postale company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

La Banque Postale company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company nor La Banque Postale company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to La Banque Postale company.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company employs more people globally than La Banque Postale company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor La Banque Postale holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N