Comparison Overview

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

VS

Akbank

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale

4, Rue Frédéric-Guillaume Raiffeisen, Strasbourg, Grand Est, FR, 67000
Last Update: 2026-01-19

Bancassureur de premier plan en France avec 79 000 collaborateurs au service de 31 millions de clients, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale propose une offre multiservice à une clientèle de particuliers, de professionnels de proximité et entreprises de toutes tailles, via plus de 4 000 points de vente. Banque coopérative et mutualiste, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe les Caisses de Crédit Mutuel des Fédérations Centre Est Europe (Strasbourg), Sud-Est (Lyon), Ile-de-France (Paris), Savoie-Mont Blanc (Annecy), Midi-Atlantique (Toulouse), Loire-Atlantique et Centre Ouest (Nantes), Centre (Orléans), Normandie (Caen), Dauphiné-Vivarais (Valence), Méditerranéen (Marseille), Anjou (Angers), Massif Central (Clermont-Ferrand), Antilles-Guyane (Fort-de-France) et Nord Europe (Lille). Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale regroupe également la Caisse Fédérale de Crédit Mutuel, la Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel (BFCM) et l’ensemble de ses filiales, notamment le CIC, Euro-Information, les Assurances du Crédit Mutuel (ACM), TARGOBANK, Cofidis Group, Beobank, la Banque Européenne du Crédit Mutuel (BECM), Banque de Luxembourg, Banque Transatlantique et Homiris. Au Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, nous valorisons la créativité et l’envie d’entreprendre de nos collaborateurs, au travers de métiers riches et diversifiés permettant à tous les profils de s’épanouir et d’évoluer. Vous souhaitez nous rejoindre ? Retrouvez notre site carrière : https://recrutement.creditmutuel.fr/fr/index.html Découvrez nos autres réseaux sociaux : ➡️ X : https://x.com/CreditMutuelAF ➡️ Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/creditmutuelaf.recrute ➡️ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@creditmutuelalliancefederale

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,553
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Akbank

4. Levent Besiktas, Istanbul, 4. Levent, TR, 34330
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Akbank was founded as a local bank in Adana in January 1948. Established originally with the core objective to provide funding to local cotton producers, the Bank opened its first branch in the Sirkeci district of Istanbul on July 14, 1950. In 1954, after relocating its Head Office to Istanbul, the Bank rapidly expanded its branch network and had automated all banking operations by 1963. Floated to the public in 1990, Akbank shares began trading on international markets and as an American Depository Receipt (ADR) after its secondary public offering in 1998. Akbank established AKSecurities in 1996, AKInvestment Trust in 1998, AKAssetManagement Company and its Private Banking Department in 2000 and Ak Pension Company in 2003. Akbank acquired AKLease in 2005 and Ak Pension Company was sold to Ak Insurance in February 2006. Akbank conducts overseas operations through its subsidiaries in Germany (Akbank AG), the Netherlands (Akbank NV) and Dubai (Akbank Dubai Limited) as well as a branch in Malta. As part of the initiative to restructure its overseas subsidiaries, Akbank decided to consolidate Akbank AG and Akbank NV under the corporate umbrella of Akbank AG; the merger is currently underway. In addition to its core banking activities, Akbank offers a wide range of consumer, commercial and SME, corporate and private banking services as well as foreign trade financing. For more information about Akbank, please visit at http://www.akbank.com.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,432
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akbank.jpeg
Akbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Akbank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akbank in 2026.

Incident History — Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Akbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/créditmutuelalliancefédérale.jpeg
Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akbank.jpeg
Akbank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Akbank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Akbank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company.

In the current year, Akbank company and Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Akbank company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Akbank company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Akbank company nor Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company nor Akbank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Akbank company.

Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale company employs more people globally than Akbank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale nor Akbank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N