Comparison Overview

Cryptopia

VS

Ubisoft

Cryptopia

Utrecht, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Cryptopia is a persistent world, open-ended, multiplayer strategy and role-playing game that provides a solution to the problem of our unstable world economy. Built entirely on the blockchain, gamers can enjoy the security, visibility, and other benefits of this technology while having fun creating their own ideal society - an independent city-state where citizens can buy, sell, vote, and perform other essential activities using a safe, secure, and transparent system. Additionally, as a seasteading country, Cryptopia World lies outside of any existing nation’s borders, allowing its citizens free reign to experiment and create the community they want for themselves. Cryptopia has become humanity’s haven, the reboot of society the world needs to survive.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Ubisoft

2, Avenue Pasteur, Saint-Mandé, Île-de-France, FR, 94160
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 600 and 649

Ubisoft is a global leader in gaming with teams across the world crafting original and memorable gaming experiences featuring brands such as Assassin’s Creed®, Brawlhalla®, For Honor®, Far Cry®, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon®, Just Dance®, Rabbids®, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six®, The Crew® and Tom Clancy’s The Division®. We believe diverse perspectives help both players and teams thrive. If you’re passionate about innovation and pushing entertainment boundaries, join our journey and help us create the unknown!

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18,483
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cryptopiametaverse.jpeg
Cryptopia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cryptopia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ubisoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cryptopia in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

Ubisoft has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Cryptopia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cryptopia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ubisoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ubisoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cryptopiametaverse.jpeg
Cryptopia
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial extortion via data theft and public release threats
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cryptopia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ubisoft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ubisoft company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Cryptopia company.

In the current year, Ubisoft company has reported more cyber incidents than Cryptopia company.

Ubisoft company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cryptopia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Ubisoft company and Cryptopia company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Ubisoft company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Cryptopia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cryptopia company nor Ubisoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cryptopia company nor Ubisoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ubisoft company employs more people globally than Cryptopia company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Games.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cryptopia nor Ubisoft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L