Comparison Overview

CRUCE design group

VS

en mode design

CRUCE design group

Montevideo, Montevideo, UY
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Somos un estudio con base en Uruguay, especializado en crear soluciones gráficas atractivas y eficientes en las áreas de diseño de identidad visual y packaging. Nuestros diseños están presentes en más de 20 países, y tenemos experiencia en más de 50 categorías. Nuestro diseño refleja nuestra forma de entender el negocio: trabajamos para dar satisfacción a los clientes de nuestros clientes, para persuadirlos en la elección de sus productos o servicios y para ayudarlos a construir relaciones durarderas con sus marcas.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

en mode design

146 Park Ave., Pewaukee, WI, 53072, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

en mode design is a boutique graphic design agency that thrives on helping you reach your goals quickly, efficiently and creatively. Our diverse capabilities include print, interactive, exhibit and digital graphics. Each designer brings their own specialized skills and innovative imagination to the table, making our collaborative team of five dynamic, flexible and capable of tackling any size project. We would love to work with you! We will partner with you to empower your brand using the most creative and professional ideas to engage your audience and drive your success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crucedesigngroup.jpeg
CRUCE design group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/en-mode-design.jpeg
en mode design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CRUCE design group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
en mode design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRUCE design group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for en mode design in 2025.

Incident History — CRUCE design group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRUCE design group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — en mode design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

en mode design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crucedesigngroup.jpeg
CRUCE design group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/en-mode-design.jpeg
en mode design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

en mode design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CRUCE design group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, en mode design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CRUCE design group company.

In the current year, en mode design company and CRUCE design group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither en mode design company nor CRUCE design group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither en mode design company nor CRUCE design group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither en mode design company nor CRUCE design group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CRUCE design group company nor en mode design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CRUCE design group company nor en mode design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

en mode design company employs more people globally than CRUCE design group company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CRUCE design group nor en mode design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X