Comparison Overview

CRRC Corporation Ltd.

VS

ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd

CRRC Corporation Ltd.

None, None, Beijing, None, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CRRC undertakes design, manufacture, testing, commissioning and maintenance of locomotives and rolling stock, including: electric locomotives, diesel-electric and diesel-hydraulic locomotives from 280 kw to 10,000 kw for mainline and shunting duties; high-speed trains of speed over 350 km/h; DMUs and EMUs for urban, suburban and regional transport; trams and light rail vehicles; metro cars and passenger coaches; as well as full line of freight wagons, such as covered wagons; open-top wagons for coal, ore, steel and timber; hopper wagons for grain, ore, fertilizer; flat wagons; double-deck container flat wagons; tank wagons for all types of liquid and chemicals; tipper wagons, schnabel and depressed center wagons, as well as track machinery.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 347
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd

#02-09 The Riverside Piazza, Singapore, -, SG, 059608
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

Eta SP Engineers Pte Ltd is a Singaporean owned and managed company. Its roots may be traced back to 1993 when it was known as Eta SP. In 2013, we incorporated Eta SP Engineers Pte. Ltd. as a private limited company to grow the business further. We are able to provide a full suite of engineering services from consultancy, design, machining fabrication, on-site installation , commissioning and many more. Eta SP has built its’ reputation on being able to fulfill the unique requirements of any customer’s specific needs. To this end, existing equipment, machinery or even vehicles can be modified or designed and built by us in order to provide suitable solutions for the tasks at hand. Since the mid-1990’s 90% of our business has been supporting the Railway industry, both in Singapore and overseas. We also support the industry by providing engineering for integrating components into a system, equipment maintenance, upgrading, refurbishing, retro-fitting and the supply of spares and replacement parts.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crrc-corporation-ltd.jpeg
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eta-sp-engineers-pte-ltd.jpeg
ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRRC Corporation Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — CRRC Corporation Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRRC Corporation Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crrc-corporation-ltd.jpeg
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eta-sp-engineers-pte-ltd.jpeg
ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CRRC Corporation Ltd. company and ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CRRC Corporation Ltd. company.

In the current year, ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company and CRRC Corporation Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. company nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. company nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CRRC Corporation Ltd. company employs more people globally than ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. nor ETA SP Engineers Pte Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H