Comparison Overview

Crown Law

VS

Peterson Law LLP

Crown Law

undefined, Wellington and Auckland Offices, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Trusted Legal Advisors to the New Zealand Government since 1875. The Crown Law Office provides legal advice and representation services to the government in matters affecting the executive government, particularly in the areas of criminal, public and administrative law. The services provided include matters covering judicial review of government actions, constitutional questions including Treaty of Waitangi issues, the enforcement of criminal law, and protection of the revenue. The Office administers the prosecution process in the criminal justice system, in particular, Crown prosecutions. The Office has two primary purposes in providing these services: • to ensure that the operations and responsibilities of the executive government are conducted lawfully, and • to ensure that the government is not prevented, through legal process, from lawfully implementing its chosen policies and discharging its governmental responsibilities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peterson Law LLP

545 Metro Place South, Suite 435, None, Dublin, Ohio, US, 43017
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

At Peterson Law LLP, we use innovative legal strategies to help clients find practical solutions to their legal issues. With experience in several practice areas, we have one goal: to help you achieve your objectives. We take a principled approach to practicing law. At every step that we work with you, we will do so with integrity. Our Ohio team strongly believes in offering sophisticated, effective representation in a manner that provides value to you. We frequently achieve the results that we seek via alternative dispute resolution. As skilled litigators, we will also advocate for you in court. Whether resolving a business dispute, purchasing or selling real estate or defending you from criminal charges, Peterson Law LLP is here to stand with you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crown-law.jpeg
Crown Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peterson-llp.jpeg
Peterson Law LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crown Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peterson Law LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crown Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peterson Law LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Crown Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crown Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peterson Law LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peterson Law LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crown-law.jpeg
Crown Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peterson-llp.jpeg
Peterson Law LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Crown Law company and Peterson Law LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Peterson Law LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Crown Law company.

In the current year, Peterson Law LLP company and Crown Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peterson Law LLP company nor Crown Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Peterson Law LLP company nor Crown Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Peterson Law LLP company nor Crown Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crown Law company nor Peterson Law LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Crown Law company nor Peterson Law LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crown Law company employs more people globally than Peterson Law LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crown Law nor Peterson Law LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X