Comparison Overview

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.

VS

General Dynamics

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.

403 N Nanticoke Ave, Endicott, New York, 13760, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Crowley Fabricating & Machining Co., Inc. Endicott New York, United States.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

General Dynamics

11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, Virginia, 20190, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs over 100,000 people in 43 countries around the world. At the heart of our company are our employees. We rely on their intimate knowledge of customer requirements and a unique blend of skill and innovation to develop and produce the best possible products and services. The driver that makes our company agile, and ensures our continued performance, is our culture of continuous improvement. This culture enforces a shared commitment to consistently look toward the future and to embrace change. Itโ€™s a priority at all levels of our company, with every employee engaged in finding new ways to do things faster, better and more cost-effectively, and push the boundaries of our potential.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowley-fabricating.jpeg
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics.jpeg
General Dynamics
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Dynamics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowley-fabricating.jpeg
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics.jpeg
General Dynamics
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

General Dynamics company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

General Dynamics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, General Dynamics company and Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Dynamics company nor Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

General Dynamics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither General Dynamics company nor Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company nor General Dynamics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company nor General Dynamics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

General Dynamics company employs more people globally than Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.