Comparison Overview

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.

VS

Aselsan

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.

403 N Nanticoke Ave, Endicott, New York, 13760, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Crowley Fabricating & Machining Co., Inc. Endicott New York, United States.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aselsan

296. Cadde 16, Mehmet Akif Ersoy, Ankara, 06200, TR
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

ASELSAN is a company of Turkish Armed Forces Foundation, established in 1975 in order to meet the communication needs of the Turkish Armed Forces by national means. Currently โ€‹74,20% of the shares are owned by the Foundation whereas the remaining 25,8% runs in ฤฐstanbul Borsa stock market. ASELSAN is the largest defense electronics company of Turkey whose capability/product portfolio comprises communication and information technologies, radar and electronic warfare, electro-optics, avionics, unmanned systems, land, naval and weapon systems, air defence and missile systems, command and control systems, transportation, security, traffic, automation and medical systems. Today ASELSAN has become an indigenous products exporting company, investing in international markets through various cooperation models with local partners and listed as one of the top 100 defence companies of the world (Defense News Top 100).

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,729
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowley-fabricating.jpeg
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aselsan.jpeg
Aselsan
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aselsan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Aselsan has 212.5% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Aselsan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aselsan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowley-fabricating.jpeg
Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aselsan.jpeg
Aselsan
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing email with malicious .url file
Motivation: Cyber espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company and Aselsan company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Aselsan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aselsan company has reported more cyber incidents than Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company.

Neither Aselsan company nor Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aselsan company nor Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Aselsan company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company nor Aselsan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company nor Aselsan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aselsan company employs more people globally than Crowley Fabrication & Machining Co. Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.