Comparison Overview

Crossway

VS

PacificBasin Communications

Crossway

1300 Crescent St, Wheaton, IL, 60187, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crossway.org

Crossway is a not-for-profit publisher of Christian books, the English Standard Version (ESV) Bible, and other gospel literature. The purpose of Crossway is to publish gospel-centered, Bible-centered content that will honor our Savior and serve his Church. We seek to help people understand the massive implications of the gospel and the truth of God’s Word, for all of life, for all eternity, and for the glory of God. Any surplus that may arise shall be used solely to further the ministry and shall not inure to the benefit of any individual.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PacificBasin Communications

1088 Bishop St, Honolulu, 96813, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aiohawaii.com/publishing-printing

Communications is the cornerstone of the aio family of companies. As a leader in Island media, we deliver unsurpassed print and online products that inform and inspire, educate and entertain. With a reputation for editorial excellence and creative marketing, aio media encompasses Hawaii's largest magazine group, best-selling books, quality printing services and a variety of custom publishing opportunities. Our Ohana of Publications include: Hawaii Business Hawaii Magazine Hawaii Buyer's Guide Hawaii Home + Remodeling Honolulu Magazine MANA Magazine PacificBasin Communications is apart of the aio Ohana of companies. http://www.aiohawaii.com/

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossway.jpeg
Crossway
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificbasin-communications.jpeg
PacificBasin Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crossway
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PacificBasin Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossway in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PacificBasin Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Crossway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PacificBasin Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PacificBasin Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossway.jpeg
Crossway
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificbasin-communications.jpeg
PacificBasin Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crossway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PacificBasin Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PacificBasin Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Crossway company.

In the current year, PacificBasin Communications company and Crossway company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PacificBasin Communications company nor Crossway company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PacificBasin Communications company nor Crossway company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PacificBasin Communications company nor Crossway company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crossway company nor PacificBasin Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Crossway company nor PacificBasin Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crossway company employs more people globally than PacificBasin Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crossway nor PacificBasin Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References