Comparison Overview

Crossway Baptist Church

VS

Folkekirken

Crossway Baptist Church

None
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Crossway is one church based in Melbourne, Australia that loves God, loves people and makes disciples. We have services in English, Mandarin, Cantonese, Indonesian and Korean. To find out more about Crossway visit Sunday Service Times: 8:45am, 10:15am, 11:45am, 6pm

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Folkekirken

Denmark, DK
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Folkekirken har været med til at bygge samfund i mere end 1000 år - og gør det stadig. Folkekirken er tæt på den enkelte i livets afgørende faser, åbner fællesskaber, forvalter kulturarv og kulturliv lokalt og bidrager til den store samtale om, hvilket samfund vi ønsker. Som Danmarks største medlemsorganisation er folkekirken organiseret i stifter, provstier og sogne, der styres lokalt af menighedsrådene. Der findes over 2.000 kirker i Danmark, og meget af kirkens arbejde er knyttet til en sognekirke. Men folkekirken er også til stede mange andre steder: På hospitalet, på hospice, på gaden, på uddannelsessteder, ved ulykker og kriser, i felten, i fængslet. På LinkedIn fortæller vi om folkekirken som professionel organisation og som en væsentlig aktør i samfundet.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossway-baptist-church.jpeg
Crossway Baptist Church
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folkekirken.jpeg
Folkekirken
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Crossway Baptist Church
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Folkekirken
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Religious Institutions Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossway Baptist Church in 2025.

Incidents vs Religious Institutions Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Folkekirken in 2025.

Incident History — Crossway Baptist Church (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossway Baptist Church cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Folkekirken (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Folkekirken cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossway-baptist-church.jpeg
Crossway Baptist Church
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folkekirken.jpeg
Folkekirken
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Crossway Baptist Church company and Folkekirken company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Folkekirken company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Crossway Baptist Church company.

In the current year, Folkekirken company and Crossway Baptist Church company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Folkekirken company nor Crossway Baptist Church company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Folkekirken company nor Crossway Baptist Church company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Folkekirken company nor Crossway Baptist Church company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crossway Baptist Church company nor Folkekirken company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crossway Baptist Church company nor Folkekirken company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Crossway Baptist Church company nor Folkekirken company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N