Comparison Overview

Crittenton Services

VS

Youth Consultation Service (YCS)

Crittenton Services

801 E. Chapman Ave #203, Fullerton, CA, 92831, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Established and incorporated in 1966, Crittenton Services is a nonprofit organization that seeks a world where every person is connected to safe and healthy relationships. Crittenton offers behavioral health care, safe shelter, and individualized support to help people in need heal from trauma and reach their full potential. Our organization takes pride in the standards of care we've set for our programs earning us national accreditation and a gold level standard of distinction by The Joint Commission. The programs that Crittenton is known for include Community-Based Services, Family Preservation, Intensive Field Capable Clinical Services, Outpatient Mental Health, School-Linked Mental Health, Foster Care Services, and a Transitional Age Youth Program. With nearly 2,000 youth and families served each year our service planning areas expand through various regions in Southern California and we gladly serve Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside counties.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 314
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Youth Consultation Service (YCS)

25 East Salem Street, 3rd Floor, Hackensack, NJ, US, 07601
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 700 and 749

Each day YCS cares for approximately 1,500 children, by providing either residential care or in-community and in-home services. Some of the children are separated from their loved ones and have been affected by trauma, others are unable to live at home because of intellectual and developmental disabilities that adversely affect their behavior. Whatever the child's special education, mental health or behavioral health needs, the caring YCS staff is prepared to offer individualized services to both the child and family. With your support, we can help our children find hope, and cultivate strength and resilience for a brighter future. Our Mission: To partner with at-risk and special needs children, youth and young adults to build happier, healthier, more hopeful lives within families and communities

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 641
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crittenton-services-for-children-and-families.jpeg
Crittenton Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ycs.jpeg
Youth Consultation Service (YCS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crittenton Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Youth Consultation Service (YCS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crittenton Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Youth Consultation Service (YCS) in 2026.

Incident History — Crittenton Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crittenton Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Youth Consultation Service (YCS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Youth Consultation Service (YCS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crittenton-services-for-children-and-families.jpeg
Crittenton Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ycs.jpeg
Youth Consultation Service (YCS)
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Crittenton Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crittenton Services company has not reported any.

In the current year, Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company and Crittenton Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company nor Crittenton Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Crittenton Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company nor Crittenton Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crittenton Services company nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Crittenton Services company nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Youth Consultation Service (YCS) company employs more people globally than Crittenton Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crittenton Services nor Youth Consultation Service (YCS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N