Comparison Overview

CRISP Shared Services

VS

Grossmont Healthcare District

CRISP Shared Services

None, None, Columbia, Maryland, US, 21044
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.crispsharedservices.org/

CRISP Shared Services is a nonprofit dedicated to improving health infrastructure and data exchange technology nationwide. We collaborate with organizations to deliver modern, efficient solutions that enhance patient care, streamline care coordination and advance public health. With a proven track record in data modernization and infrastructure deployment across both public and private sectors, we provide industry-leading solutions tailored to meet the unique needs of diverse jurisdictions and populations. Our extensive experience in interoperability innovation enables us to build infrastructure that is affordable, scalable and impactful to advance healthcare ecosystems and improve health outcomes.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Grossmont Healthcare District

9001 Wakarusa St, La Mesa, California, 91942-3300, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grossmonthealthcare.org

The Grossmont Healthcare District (GHD) is a public agency that supports the health & wellness of East San Diego County. We operate a Health & Wellness Library, fund local nonprofits through grants and sponsorships, support the region's future generations through scholarships, and offer free wellness programs to the community. The District is governed by a five-member Board of Directors, elected at large to four-year terms, representing more than 500,000 people living within the District's 750 square miles.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crisp-shared-services.jpeg
CRISP Shared Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grossmonthealthcare.jpeg
Grossmont Healthcare District
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CRISP Shared Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grossmont Healthcare District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRISP Shared Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grossmont Healthcare District in 2025.

Incident History — CRISP Shared Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRISP Shared Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grossmont Healthcare District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grossmont Healthcare District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crisp-shared-services.jpeg
CRISP Shared Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grossmonthealthcare.jpeg
Grossmont Healthcare District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CRISP Shared Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grossmont Healthcare District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grossmont Healthcare District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CRISP Shared Services company.

In the current year, Grossmont Healthcare District company and CRISP Shared Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grossmont Healthcare District company nor CRISP Shared Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grossmont Healthcare District company nor CRISP Shared Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grossmont Healthcare District company nor CRISP Shared Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CRISP Shared Services company nor Grossmont Healthcare District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CRISP Shared Services company nor Grossmont Healthcare District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CRISP Shared Services company employs more people globally than Grossmont Healthcare District company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CRISP Shared Services nor Grossmont Healthcare District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References