Comparison Overview

CreditEase

VS

LOLC Holdings PLC

CreditEase

朝阳区建国路88号SOHO现代城16层, 北京, 北京, undefined, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2006, CreditEase is a Beijing-based world-leading FinTech conglomerate in China. It specializes in inclusive finance and wealth management with a dominant position in credit technology, wealth management technology, insurance technology, etc. Main business sectors of CreditEase include Yiren Digital, CreditEase Wealth Management and CreditEase Insurance. Better tech, better finance, better world.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16,982
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LOLC Holdings PLC

No. 100/1, Sri Jayewardenepura Mawatha, Rajagiriya,, 10100, LK
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

A formidable global conglomerate, LOLC Holdings has strategically diversified into key economic growth sectors across financial services, leisure, agriculture and plantations, construction and real estate, manufacturing and trading, technology, research and innovation and strategic investments. The LOLC Group is on an accelerated growth trajectory and is inspired by the quest to nurture and shape the future of individuals and communities across the world. As a leading player in the International MSME sector, the LOLC Group has been a catalyst in facilitating, whilst striving to maximise environmental benefits through green financing, promoting financial independence for women and uplifting customers from poverty through financial inclusion in global markets. In keeping with its alignment to UN Sustainable Development Goals, LOLC is a catalyst of economic development as a responsible lender while maintaining strong client protection principles. Transforming communities in the South and South East Asian markets, the LOLC Group has made giant strides to entrench its footprint across Africa and Central Asia. The Group has already built its reputation as one of the largest multi-currency, multi-geography inclusive finance platform in the world, backed by advanced tech platforms designed by its fully-owned subsidiary companies which have now been successfully adopted across borders.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CreditEase
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LOLC Holdings PLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CreditEase in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LOLC Holdings PLC in 2025.

Incident History — CreditEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CreditEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LOLC Holdings PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LOLC Holdings PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CreditEase company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LOLC Holdings PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LOLC Holdings PLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CreditEase company.

In the current year, LOLC Holdings PLC company and CreditEase company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC company nor CreditEase company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC company nor CreditEase company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC company nor CreditEase company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CreditEase company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CreditEase company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CreditEase company employs more people globally than LOLC Holdings PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CreditEase nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H