Comparison Overview

Credit Suisse

VS

Regions Bank

Credit Suisse

Paradeplatz 8, None, Zurich, None, CH, 8070
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Credit Suisse Group AG has been acquired by UBS Group AG. UBS is the world’s largest and only truly global wealth manager. We operate through four business divisions: Global Wealth Management, Personal & Corporate Banking, Asset Management, and the Investment Bank. Our global reach and the breadth of our expertise set us apart from our competitors. From gaining new experiences in different roles to acquiring fresh knowledge and skills, we know that great work is never done alone. We know that it’s our people, with their unique backgrounds, skills, experience levels and interests, who drive our ongoing success. Together we’re more than ourselves. Ready to be part of #teamUBS and make an impact? Visit our Jobs section to explore the current job openings or visit https://www.ubs.com/global/en/careers.html UBS is an Equal Opportunity Employer. We respect and seek to empower each individual and support the diverse cultures, perspectives, skills, and experiences within our workforce. www.ubs.com/social-legal

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 19,632
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Regions Bank

1900 5th Ave N, None, Birmingham, Alabama, US, 35203
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Regions Financial Corporation is a member of the S&P 500 Index and is one of the nation’s largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services. Regions serves customers across the South, Midwest and Texas, and through its subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates more than 1,250 banking offices and more than 2,000 ATMs. Additional information about Regions and its full line of products and services can be found at www.regions.com. Ticker Symbol: RF on the NYSE Regions' Social Media & Community Guidelines: http://spr.ly/lismcg Regions' Privacy & Security Policy: http://spr.ly/lipp https://www.regions.com/help/social-media Regions Bank, Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender. NMLS #174490. Only bank deposits are FDIC insured. Non-Deposit Products including Investments, Securities, Mutual Funds, Insurance Products, Crypto Assets, and Annuities Are Not FDIC Insured | Are Not Bank Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Are Not Deposits | Are not a condition of any Banking Activity | Are Not Insured by any Government Agency Equal Opportunity Employer/Including Disabled/Veterans Regions provides links to other websites or apps for your convenience and does not control the content, services or products provided on the linked website or app, whose Privacy and security policies or procedures may differ. Consult the policies or disclosures on their website. © 2024 Regions Bank. Regions and the Regions logo are registered trademarks of Regions Bank. The LifeGreen color is a trademark of Regions Bank.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 22,183
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/credit-suisse.jpeg
Credit Suisse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regions-financial-corporation.jpeg
Regions Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Credit Suisse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Regions Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Credit Suisse in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regions Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Credit Suisse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Credit Suisse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Regions Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regions Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/credit-suisse.jpeg
Credit Suisse
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Third-party supplier compromise
Motivation: Data exfiltration and potential ransom demand
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regions-financial-corporation.jpeg
Regions Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2011
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Loss of USB flash drive
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Regions Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Credit Suisse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Credit Suisse company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Regions Bank company.

In the current year, Credit Suisse company has reported more cyber incidents than Regions Bank company.

Credit Suisse company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Regions Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Regions Bank company and Credit Suisse company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Regions Bank company nor Credit Suisse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Credit Suisse company nor Regions Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Credit Suisse company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Regions Bank company.

Regions Bank company employs more people globally than Credit Suisse company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Regions Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H