Comparison Overview

Crary Buchanan

VS

AppearMe

Crary Buchanan

759 SW Federal Hwy Ste 106, Stuart, FL, 34994, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Crary Buchanan, founded in 1927, is one of the oldest law firms on Florida's Treasure Coast. The firm's offices are located in Stuart and Port St. Lucie. We serve a broad range of individual and business clients in Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee, Palm Beach and Indian River Counties. Our breadth of legal experience and over 80 years of in-depth knowledge of our community enable Crary Buchanan attorneys to provide exceptional legal services to our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AppearMe

801 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 210-B, Glendale, California, 91203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

AppearMe is a UC Berkeley SkyDeck legal startup that connect litigators with appearance, deposition and freelance attorneys in 60 seconds. AppearMe is a real-time and on-demand solution which lets you find the help you need 10 minutes prior to the appearance time or a month ahead! Over 10,000 attorneys have already registered with AppearMe. They enjoy the benefits of finding an appearance attorney or claiming appearances in numerous civil and criminal cases, as well as areas like business law, family law, and many others. Our goal was to create an app that was insanely useful, effective and lucrative for the users. Any attorney who has practiced some form of litigation knows that once in a while he or she needs someone to cover an appearance for them. AppearMe’s usefulness is undeniable – it essentially lets you find an appearance attorney anytime you need one within minutes. AppearMe is so effective that it takes 2-3 minutes to upload one’s case info and another 60 seconds for another attorney to commit to making your appearance for you. AppearMe is extremely affordable for the one seeking an appearance attorney and profitable for the one making the appearance. Lastly, attorneys can use the app in both modes – to find appearance attorneys and to make appearances. This lets one schedule ahead to plan for trips or court conflicts or to cover emergencies or fill up free time with income generating appearances! For more information, please visit: https://www.appearme.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crary-buchanan-bowdish-bovie-beres-elder-&-williamson-chartered.jpeg
Crary Buchanan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appearme.jpeg
AppearMe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Crary Buchanan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AppearMe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crary Buchanan in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AppearMe in 2025.

Incident History — Crary Buchanan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crary Buchanan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AppearMe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AppearMe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crary-buchanan-bowdish-bovie-beres-elder-&-williamson-chartered.jpeg
Crary Buchanan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appearme.jpeg
AppearMe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crary Buchanan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AppearMe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AppearMe company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Crary Buchanan company.

In the current year, AppearMe company and Crary Buchanan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AppearMe company nor Crary Buchanan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AppearMe company nor Crary Buchanan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AppearMe company nor Crary Buchanan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Crary Buchanan company nor AppearMe company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Crary Buchanan company nor AppearMe company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crary Buchanan company employs more people globally than AppearMe company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Crary Buchanan nor AppearMe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X