Comparison Overview

Cranbrook Institute of Science

VS

Birmingham Museum of Art

Cranbrook Institute of Science

39221 Woodward Avenue, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, US, 48303-0801
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Cranbrook Institute of Science is a science and natural history museum that strives to nurture curiosity, advance scientific literacy, and encourage advocacy for our natural and cultural worlds. As a premier resource for science and natural history, the Institute of Science consistently delivers an extraordinary, transformational experience for students, families, and educators. We welcome all curious minds to explore and discover here and invite you to ignite your curiosity at Cranbrook Institute of Science.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Birmingham Museum of Art

2000 Reverend Abraham Woods Jr Blvd, Birmingham, Alabama, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1951, the Birmingham Museum of Art has one of the finest collections in the Southeast. More than 26,000 objects displayed and housed within the Museum represent a rich panorama of cultures, including Asian, European, American, African, Pre-Columbian, and Native American. Highlights include the Museum’s collection of Asian art, Vietnamese ceramics, the Kress collection of Renaissance and Baroque paintings, sculpture, and decorative arts from the late 13th century to the 1750s, and the Museum’s world-renowned collection of Wedgwood, the largest outside of England.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cranbrook-institute-of-science.jpeg
Cranbrook Institute of Science
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-museum-of-art.jpeg
Birmingham Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cranbrook Institute of Science
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Birmingham Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cranbrook Institute of Science in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Cranbrook Institute of Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cranbrook Institute of Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Birmingham Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cranbrook-institute-of-science.jpeg
Cranbrook Institute of Science
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-museum-of-art.jpeg
Birmingham Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cranbrook Institute of Science company and Birmingham Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Birmingham Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cranbrook Institute of Science company.

In the current year, Birmingham Museum of Art company and Cranbrook Institute of Science company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Birmingham Museum of Art company nor Cranbrook Institute of Science company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Birmingham Museum of Art company nor Cranbrook Institute of Science company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Birmingham Museum of Art company nor Cranbrook Institute of Science company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science company nor Birmingham Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science company nor Birmingham Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Birmingham Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Cranbrook Institute of Science company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cranbrook Institute of Science nor Birmingham Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X