Comparison Overview

Cramp Law Firm, PLLC

VS

Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC

Cramp Law Firm, PLLC

Alamo Towers West, 901 NE Loop 410, San Antonio, Texas 78209, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cramp Law Firm, PLLC, located in San Antonio, provides a spectrum of family-related legal services for people in Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall counties. The founder, attorney Jim Cramp, is a strong and committed family law counselor and advocate for all. Being a retired colonel with nearly 30 years active military service, Jim brings a unique perspective to family law issues impacting DOD-affiliated and other Federal civil service families. Altogether, Jim has an in-depth understanding of the issues impacting all families in the following areas: San Antonio, TX Family Law Attorney Divorce Military Divorce Federal Civil Service Divorce Children's Issues Division of Community Property Modification of Orders Premarital & Marital Property Agreements Estate Planning - Wills & Trusts Probate

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC

850 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 308, Trenton, NJ, 08628, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Szaferman Lakind is a multi-practice law firm centrally located in Trenton, New Jersey, close to the State capital. The firm members are established and experienced trial attorneys in their respective fields of concentration. Heavy emphasis is placed on: •Litigation and trial of personal injury matters •Litigation, trial and defense of workers' compensation claims •Litigation and trial of disability claims •Trial and defense of municipal court and superior court criminal charges •Litigation and trial of complex commercial and business disputes Szaferman Lakind, takes pride in its experience, professional reliability and cost effective attention to the particular concerns and needs of its clients. Sam Gaylord and Bryce Chase are certified by the New Jersey Supreme Court as a workers' compensation attorneys. The attorneys and paralegals at Szaferman Lakind are supported by computerized electronic research and retrieval systems, and computer based data and word processing. The firm has on-line access to the internet and data filed and recorded governmental agencies. Westlaw™ provides access to up-to-the-minute decisions of courts of all fifty states and all federal courts. Serving central New Jersey clients in Trenton, Hightstown, Pennington, East Brunswick, Edison, Middlesex, New Brunswick, Ewing, Hamilton and Lawrence. Old Bridge, Monroe, and other communities in Mercer County, Somerset County, Monmouth County, and Middlesex County, Camden, Burlington, Gloucester, Atlantic and Hunterdon Counties.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cramp-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Cramp Law Firm, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaylord-popp-llc.jpeg
Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cramp Law Firm, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cramp Law Firm, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC in 2025.

Incident History — Cramp Law Firm, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cramp Law Firm, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cramp-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Cramp Law Firm, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaylord-popp-llc.jpeg
Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company.

In the current year, Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company and Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company nor Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company nor Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company nor Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC company employs more people globally than Cramp Law Firm, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cramp Law Firm, PLLC nor Szaferman Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X