Comparison Overview

Craftsmen

VS

J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim

Craftsmen

1290 Collier Road NW, Atlanta, 30318, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.craftsmenprinting.com

An Important Company Update Since 1981, Craftsmen Printing has had an incredible history of serving clients throughout metro Atlanta and beyond. We are happy to announce a new opportunity for our customer community. As of February 15, 2018, our award-winning team will be joining the huddle at Collins Digital Imaging. We will continue to provide the ultimate in customer care, while delivering expanded quality print and fulfillment solutions for your marketing materials. It’s always exciting to see what’s coming up next - new ideas, new trends, and new playbook strategies. Collins is a family firm being managed by the second and third generation. We are confident that there will be a smooth transition for all clients, and we welcome any questions you may have about the new formation. We are truly grateful for the privilege of working with many talented people on successful ink-on-paper communications over the years. We know that your projects will be in good hands going forward. Again, thank you for your loyalty. Sincerely, Kathy and Bruce McDonald Founders and Owners, Craftsmen Printing Company to you - the client

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim

undefined, High Point, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jcmfg.com

JC MANUFACTURING INC. was founded in 1979 quickly becoming one the largest supplier of barcode printing for JC Penney Company, Mervyn’s Company of California and Nike. Since that time JCMFG has become a major supplier for retailers such as Gap, Old Navy, Tommy Hilfiger, Target and Banana Republic, just to name a few. JC MANUFACTURING INC. operates nine (9) manufacturing facilities worldwide – 1 each in the USA, Korea, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Taiwan, Cambodia, China, India and Costa Rica.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/craftsmen.jpeg
Craftsmen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j.c.-manufacturing-inc..jpeg
J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Craftsmen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Craftsmen in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim in 2025.

Incident History — Craftsmen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Craftsmen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/craftsmen.jpeg
Craftsmen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j.c.-manufacturing-inc..jpeg
J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Craftsmen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Craftsmen company.

In the current year, J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company and Craftsmen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company nor Craftsmen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company nor Craftsmen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company nor Craftsmen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Craftsmen company nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Craftsmen company nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Craftsmen company employs more people globally than J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Craftsmen nor J.C. Manufacturing Inc. / JCMaxim holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References