Comparison Overview

Cracked

VS

Just Content

Cracked

undefined, Brooklyn, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cracked.com

Cracked began as a comedy magazine in 1958, jumped online in 2005, and has hooked millions of readers with its addictive blend of whip-smart humor and book-smart knowledge ever since. Cracked’s team of writers and editors knows that their audience is hungry to learn, and every article is crafted to keep their engaged and educated readership coming back. The Internet may reinvent itself every few years, but Cracked has endured thanks to its twofold commitment to teaching its readers absolutely everything and never, ever leaving them bored. Since late 2019 it has been owned and operated by Literally Media.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Just Content

10A Little Square, Braintree, CM7 1UT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.justcontent.co.uk

At Just Content, we work with publishers and information providers from concept and commissioning through to completion. We build teams of project managers, editors and other editorial specialists to operate as an extension of our clients’ in-house workforce, enabling them to get their products to market. With a client list including the biggest academic, educational and ELT publishers, we work with organisations large and small, offering a scalable outsourced service – at any point in the content journey or throughout it – to deliver high-quality print and digital content in a cost-efficient way. We like to think we stand out among packagers. Our team is made up of publishing professionals, all of whom are dedicated content specialists with many years of experience between them. Just Content team members all have experience of working for high-profile clients and many also specialise in particular areas, including STEM, vocational education and ELT. Our highly experienced in-house and freelance copyeditors, proofreaders, indexers and project managers are dedicated to ensuring the highest possible quality for all of the content that we work with. We can take content from first draft to final output or support with separate pre-press and other editorial activities as you need. Our collaborative approach means we are happy to liaise directly with authors or other suppliers if that would help you too. Just Content’s services include: Print and digital packager services Project management Product/concept research and testing Content development and author management Editorial services DEI Reviews Sensitivity Reads Product management and commissioning editor services Typesetting and design Image research and selection Permission services Consultancy Interim management Late notice and fast-turnaround projects Visit www.justcontent.co.uk or get in touch at [email protected] to find out more about what we do.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cracked.jpeg
Cracked
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/just-content-ltd.jpeg
Just Content
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cracked
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Just Content
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cracked in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Just Content in 2025.

Incident History — Cracked (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cracked cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Just Content (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Just Content cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cracked.jpeg
Cracked
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/just-content-ltd.jpeg
Just Content
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cracked company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Just Content company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Just Content company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cracked company.

In the current year, Just Content company and Cracked company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Just Content company nor Cracked company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Just Content company nor Cracked company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Just Content company nor Cracked company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cracked company nor Just Content company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cracked company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Just Content company.

Cracked company employs more people globally than Just Content company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cracked nor Just Content holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References