Comparison Overview

CQ

VS

MA Business

CQ

1625 Eye St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

CQ provides essential intelligence and grassroots advocacy resources to take action. As the premier source of timely news, objective facts and analysis, and coverage of elections and the politics of legislation, we keep our fingers on the pulse of the legislative process and give our clients the tools they need to maximize their influence. We are the ultimate insider, and our unmatched network of relationships and expertise has powered the productivity of those who rely on us since 1945.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 246
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MA Business

Hawley Mill, Dartford, Kent, DA2 7TJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

MA Business manages a wide portfolio of business-to-business brands. These include: market leading titles including Machinery, Machinery Classified, Eureka, Works Management, New Electronics, Engineering Materials and FAST (Fastening & Assembly Solutions and Technology) for the UK’s manufacturing and engineering community of qualified engineers; Land Mobile and Tetra Today, magazines dedicated to the wireless technology and critical communications industries; Recycling & Waste World, the catalyst for change in the resource management community; Pro-Shop Europe, the leading golf trade publication; HR, the award winning magazine for HR directors; and PrintWeek, the highest-circulating and most widely read printing industry title in the UK.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cq-roll-call-group.jpeg
CQ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/findlay-media.jpeg
MA Business
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CQ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MA Business
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CQ in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MA Business in 2025.

Incident History — CQ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CQ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MA Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MA Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cq-roll-call-group.jpeg
CQ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/findlay-media.jpeg
MA Business
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CQ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MA Business company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MA Business company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CQ company.

In the current year, MA Business company and CQ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MA Business company nor CQ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MA Business company nor CQ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MA Business company nor CQ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CQ company nor MA Business company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CQ company nor MA Business company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CQ company employs more people globally than MA Business company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CQ nor MA Business holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.