Comparison Overview

CPL Systems

VS

IDEC USA

CPL Systems

1235 Eraste Landry Road, Lafayette, LA 70506, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

CPL Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 to satisfy customer demands for cost effective, single source solutions for industrial energy processes. "Dedicated to the Art of Performance" is our pledge to our customers. From its inception, CPL’s projects have always centered on the optimization of thermal process performance. From combustion performance to heat recovery, the art of optimizing performance equates to reduced energy requirements per unit of product. CPL’s services increase our customer’s sustainability by providing “green” solutions to their process energy needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IDEC USA

1175 Elko Drive, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

A global manufacturer with locations throughout Asia, North and South America, and Europe, IDEC Corporation has provided reliable automation, control and safety products worldwide for over seven decades. In the US, IDEC has over thirty local sales offices to assist customers with choosing the right programmable logic controllers (PLCs), operator interfaces (OIs), VFDs, safety sensors, safety switches, AGV / AMR drives, push button switches, relays, power supplies and more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpl-systems.jpeg
CPL Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idec.jpeg
IDEC USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CPL Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IDEC USA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPL Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDEC USA in 2025.

Incident History — CPL Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPL Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IDEC USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDEC USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpl-systems.jpeg
CPL Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idec.jpeg
IDEC USA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CPL Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IDEC USA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IDEC USA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CPL Systems company.

In the current year, IDEC USA company and CPL Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IDEC USA company nor CPL Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IDEC USA company nor CPL Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IDEC USA company nor CPL Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CPL Systems company nor IDEC USA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CPL Systems company nor IDEC USA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IDEC USA company employs more people globally than CPL Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CPL Systems nor IDEC USA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H