Comparison Overview

Courthouse Dogs Foundation

VS

Mentor Legal LLP

Courthouse Dogs Foundation

600 1st Ave, 212, Seattle, Washington, US, 98104
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Courthouse Dogs® Foundation’s mission is to promote justice with compassion via professionally trained facility dogs who provide support to everyone they reach in the justice system. We strive to accomplish our mission by: • Facilitating and leading scientific research on the use of courthouse facility dogs. • Infusing compassion and support into the judicial process including: courtrooms, forensic interviews, medical exams, and into Child Advocacy Centers and Family Justice Centers. • Offering humanity and compassion to victims’ experiences (victims who are often youth)—paradoxically using NON-humans, i.e. dogs. • Educating the public and legal professionals about the benefits of courthouse facility dogs assisting vulnerable people in the legal system. • Guiding governmental agencies (prosecutor offices and law enforcement agencies) and nonprofit organizations (child advocacy centers and victim advocacy groups) in program development using a best-practices model. • Supporting members of Assistance Dogs International (ADI), who train and place facility dogs with legal professionals. These legal professionals then work with victims, witnesses and other vulnerable people who are caught up in stressful legal proceedings. Our innovative model which harnesses the unique co-evolutionary journey humans and dogs have been on for tens of thousands of years, and utilizing the calming effect this deep human-dog bond affords, is a true and impactful shift in a very traditional judicial system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mentor Legal LLP

117 Waterloo Road, London, undefined, SE1 8UL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Mentor Legal is a London Law firm specialising in UK Immigration and Nationality law, European law, Family and Employment law. We also offer a comprehensive services for business including assistance to start ups, contracts and other areas of compliance. We aim to provide Excellency in legal services in a professional and effective way. We strive to secure the best results for our clients through our experienced team of lawyers. We understand the complexity of each case and are committed to treat every case individually.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/courthouse-dogs-foundation.jpeg
Courthouse Dogs Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Courthouse Dogs Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mentor Legal LLP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Courthouse Dogs Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mentor Legal LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Courthouse Dogs Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Courthouse Dogs Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mentor Legal LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mentor Legal LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/courthouse-dogs-foundation.jpeg
Courthouse Dogs Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mentor-global-consultancy.jpeg
Mentor Legal LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mentor Legal LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Courthouse Dogs Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mentor Legal LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Courthouse Dogs Foundation company.

In the current year, Mentor Legal LLP company and Courthouse Dogs Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mentor Legal LLP company nor Courthouse Dogs Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mentor Legal LLP company nor Courthouse Dogs Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mentor Legal LLP company nor Courthouse Dogs Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation company nor Mentor Legal LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation company nor Mentor Legal LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Courthouse Dogs Foundation company employs more people globally than Mentor Legal LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Courthouse Dogs Foundation nor Mentor Legal LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X