Comparison Overview

County of Santa Clara

VS

Swiss Federal Administration

County of Santa Clara

70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, CA, US, 95110
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The County of Santa Clara is located at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay and encompasses 1,312 square miles. It has one of the highest median family incomes in the country, and a wide diversity of cultures, backgrounds and talents. The County of Santa Clara continues to attract people from all over the world. With more than 70 agencies/departments and 22,000 employees, the County of Santa Clara plans for the needs of a dynamic community, provides quality services, and promotes a healthy, safe and prosperous community for all. The County provides essential services including public health protection, environmental protection, medical services through Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC), child and adult protection services, homelessness prevention and solutions, roads, park services, libraries, emergency response to disasters, protection of minority communities and those under threat, access to a fair criminal justice system, and scores of other services, particularly for those members of our community in the greatest need. The County's population of nearly 1.9 million is one of the largest in the state, and the largest of the nine Bay Area counties. Its population constitutes about one fourth of the Bay Area's total population. There are 15 cities including Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Milpitas, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale ranging from Palo Alto to the north, to Gilroy in the south. San Jose is the largest city in the County, with a population of 1.035 million, and is the administrative site of County Government. A significant portion of the county's land area is unincorporated ranch and farmland. Nearly 92% of the population lives in cities. The County of Santa Clara operates 27 parks covering more than 50,000 acres including scenic lakes, streams, and miles of hiking and biking trails. santaclaracounty.gov/social-media-disclaimer

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Swiss Federal Administration

Eigerstrasse 71, Bern, Bern, 3003, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Working for Switzerland Seven departments, the Federal Chancellery and around 70 administrative units make up the Federal Administration. With around 38,000 employees, it is one of the largest employers in Switzerland. People from all regions of the country work in the Federal Administration units and, at the same time, the Federal Administration has offices throughout Switzerland. Plurilingualism and cultural diversity are therefore highly valued. The tasks of the Federal Administration are as varied as Switzerland itself. Employees use their specialist knowledge and experience to perform important governmental functions. These involve projects that often shape Switzerland for several generations. This means that the employees make an important contribution to ensuring that the country runs smoothly. As an employer, the Federal Administration supports its employees' individual lifestyles with flexible working models and promotes their personal development with practical training and continuing professional development. * Open positions of the administrative units can be found on their LinkedIn pages or at stelle.admin.ch

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 22,933
Subsidiaries: 68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-of-santa-clara.jpeg
County of Santa Clara
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bundesverwaltung.jpeg
Swiss Federal Administration
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
County of Santa Clara
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swiss Federal Administration
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County of Santa Clara in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Federal Administration in 2025.

Incident History — County of Santa Clara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County of Santa Clara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swiss Federal Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Federal Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-of-santa-clara.jpeg
County of Santa Clara
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Laptop
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bundesverwaltung.jpeg
Swiss Federal Administration
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swiss Federal Administration company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to County of Santa Clara company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

County of Santa Clara company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swiss Federal Administration company has not reported any.

In the current year, Swiss Federal Administration company and County of Santa Clara company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration company nor County of Santa Clara company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

County of Santa Clara company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Swiss Federal Administration company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration company nor County of Santa Clara company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither County of Santa Clara company nor Swiss Federal Administration company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swiss Federal Administration company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to County of Santa Clara company.

Swiss Federal Administration company employs more people globally than County of Santa Clara company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds HIPAA certification.

Neither County of Santa Clara nor Swiss Federal Administration holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N