Comparison Overview

County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists

VS

SAC Attorneys LLP

County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists

County, 50 Grosvenor Hill, Mayfair, W1K 3QT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

County has attained a wealth of experience and professionalism over three decades of acting successfully on behalf of landlords, solicitors, managing agents and private clients nationwide. Services Provided: High Court Enforcement, Commercial Rent Recovery, Forfeiture of Leases, Protester Removal, Removal of; Travellers, Squatters, Persons Unknown. Process Serving, Corporate Investigations, Vacant Building Security, front of house, posts eviction security, dog handler, static security, mobile CCTV units and close protection. Association’s: CIVEA – Civil Enforcement Association; BPF – British Property Federation. Client Base: Private Landlords, Commercial Landlords, Managing Agents, Banks, Solicitors, Local Authorities and Property Investment Companies.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SAC Attorneys LLP

1754 Technology Drive, San Jose, CA, 95110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SAC Attorneys LLP ∙ Serving Silicon Valley And Beyond For strong, effective and winning legal solutions, backed by knowledge and dedication, SAC Attorneys LLP has built a track record of successful representation for clients in San Jose, throughout California's Silicon Valley and internationally. Our attorneys come from diverse backgrounds and experience, which allows us to offer comprehensive solutions for clients in a wide range of legal practice areas. Visit us online at http://www.sacattorneys.com/ Call our Silicon Valley office: 408-436-0789

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-enforcement-group.jpeg
County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sac-attorneys-llp.jpeg
SAC Attorneys LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SAC Attorneys LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAC Attorneys LLP in 2025.

Incident History — County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SAC Attorneys LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAC Attorneys LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-enforcement-group.jpeg
County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sac-attorneys-llp.jpeg
SAC Attorneys LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SAC Attorneys LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SAC Attorneys LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company.

In the current year, SAC Attorneys LLP company and County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SAC Attorneys LLP company nor County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SAC Attorneys LLP company nor County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SAC Attorneys LLP company nor County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company nor SAC Attorneys LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company nor SAC Attorneys LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists company employs more people globally than SAC Attorneys LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither County - Enforcement, Security & Technical Protester Removal Specialists nor SAC Attorneys LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X