Comparison Overview

County Cost Consultants

VS

Preston Redman Solicitors

County Cost Consultants

County Cost Consultants Ltd, Liverpool, Merseyside, L2 3PF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Based in Liverpool, Merseyside with a client base throughout the UK, County Cost Consultants have been helping our clients with their legal costs since 2000. Led by Alex Clapp and Ged Brew, our company has established itself as one of the leading exponents of legal cost consulting in the country. We have achieved this by offering a professional, commercially focused approach to our work, and, while expanding our operations, we have never lost track of the importance of offering a personal service. County Cost Consultants has assembled one of the most knowledgeable and experienced team of law cost draftsmen and law cost negotiators in the industry. Each team member deals with cases individually, including the two directors, and have an extensive understanding of the legal costs industry, having undergone rigorous in-house training combined with many years’ worth of experience. The company has evolved into a full-service cost consultancy, offering both claimant and defendant services to solicitors/insurers both locally and nationally. We are able to take on difficult cases and pride ourselves on delivering a complete service, looking after every aspect of a case from initial enquiries through to full resolution. County Cost Consultants has built up a loyal client base, many of whom have been with us since the beginning, and we have a retention rate of around 85%. We have a fantastic working relationship with our clients based on trusting, honest advice, and have become a valuable point of reference for changes in the industry. To start your relationship with County Cost Consultants, call 0844 579 6885 today.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Preston Redman Solicitors

Hinton House, Bournemouth, undefined, BH1 2EN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Preston Redman is recognised as one of the leading law firms in Dorset specialising in providing legal services to both companies and individuals. The firm has over 140 years of experience in advising clients locally, throughout the UK and overseas. We have invested in great people and resources and this combined with our wealth of experience means that we are able to offer technical expertise to deliver the most effective legal solutions for you and your business. Our core values are, and remain focused on, building and maintaining strong and positive relationships with new and existing clients, and with our colleagues, and we consider our way of working to be both professional and approachable. For more information about our services please see our services pages. We look forward to working with you. Preston Redman is committed to promoting equality and diversity in all of its internal and professional dealings. Please contact Kate McLaughlin (Practice Manager) if you would like a copy of our equality and diversity policy or our internal diversity report.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-cost-consultants.jpeg
County Cost Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preston-redman.jpeg
Preston Redman Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
County Cost Consultants
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Preston Redman Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County Cost Consultants in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Preston Redman Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — County Cost Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County Cost Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Preston Redman Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Preston Redman Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-cost-consultants.jpeg
County Cost Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preston-redman.jpeg
Preston Redman Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Preston Redman Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to County Cost Consultants company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Preston Redman Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to County Cost Consultants company.

In the current year, Preston Redman Solicitors company and County Cost Consultants company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Preston Redman Solicitors company nor County Cost Consultants company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Preston Redman Solicitors company nor County Cost Consultants company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Preston Redman Solicitors company nor County Cost Consultants company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither County Cost Consultants company nor Preston Redman Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither County Cost Consultants company nor Preston Redman Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Preston Redman Solicitors company employs more people globally than County Cost Consultants company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither County Cost Consultants nor Preston Redman Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X