Comparison Overview

Council On State Taxation

VS

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)

Council On State Taxation

122 C Street, N.W., Washington, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Council On State Taxation (COST) is a state tax organization representing business taxpayers, noted by one prominent tax policy expert as the “most influential nongovernmental organization in the state tax policy arena.” COST is a non-profit trade association based in Washington, D.C. consisting of nearly 600 multistate corporations engaged in interstate and international business. COST was formed in 1969 as the "Committee On State Taxation" by a handful of companies under the sponsorship of the Council of State Chambers of Commerce, an organization with which COST remains associated. In 2000, the organization changed its name to "Council On State Taxation". COST’s objective is to preserve and promote equitable and nondiscriminatory state and local taxation of multijurisdictional business entities.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)

105 Hatfield Street,, Cape Town, Western Province -, 8001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) was launched in the year 2000, in the aftermath of South Africa´s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The aim was to ensure that lessons learnt from South Africa´s transition from apartheid to democracy were taken into account as the nation moved ahead. Today, the Institute helps to build fair, democratic and inclusive societies in Africa through carefully selected engagements and interventions. With uncompromising excellence at the core of its work, IJR has earned a reputation for high-quality research, bold policy suggestions, and reconciliation work with impact on the ground. IJR employs a diverse and professional staff. Archbishop Desmond Tutu is the Institute's longstanding patron. The organisation has a well-established track record of sound corporate governance, and has enjoyed steady growth over the past decade.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-state-taxation.jpeg
Council On State Taxation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-justice-and-reconciliation.jpeg
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council On State Taxation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council On State Taxation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in 2025.

Incident History — Council On State Taxation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council On State Taxation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-state-taxation.jpeg
Council On State Taxation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-justice-and-reconciliation.jpeg
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Council On State Taxation company and Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council On State Taxation company.

In the current year, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company and Council On State Taxation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company nor Council On State Taxation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company nor Council On State Taxation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company nor Council On State Taxation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council On State Taxation company nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Council On State Taxation company nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company employs more people globally than Council On State Taxation company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council On State Taxation nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X