Comparison Overview

Council on Foreign Relations

VS

IEEFA North America

Council on Foreign Relations

58 East 68th Sreet, New York, 10065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-05
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cfr.org

The mission of the Council on Foreign Relations is to inform U.S. engagement with the world. Founded in 1921, CFR is a nonpartisan, independent national membership organization, think tank, educator, and publisher, including of Foreign Affairs. It generates policy-relevant ideas and analysis, convenes experts and policymakers, and promotes informed public discussion—all to have impact on the most consequential issues facing the United States and the world. CFR's website, www.cfr.org, is a trusted, nonpartisan source of timely analysis and context on international events and trends. CFR publishes the bimonthly Foreign Affairs magazine, widely-considered to be the most influential magazine for the analysis and debate of foreign policy and economics. Follow us: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cfr_org/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cfr_org X: http://x.com/CFR_org YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/cfr/featured Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 2,126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IEEFA North America

Cleveland, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
www.ieefa.org

IEEFA North America is a regional branch of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), a global independent think tank examining issues related to energy markets, trends, and policies. Our mission is to accelerate the transition to a diverse, sustainable and profitable energy economy. IEEFA North America has analysts in Canada and the United States.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-foreign-relations.jpeg
Council on Foreign Relations
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieefa-north-america.jpeg
IEEFA North America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council on Foreign Relations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IEEFA North America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council on Foreign Relations in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IEEFA North America in 2025.

Incident History — Council on Foreign Relations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council on Foreign Relations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IEEFA North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IEEFA North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-foreign-relations.jpeg
Council on Foreign Relations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieefa-north-america.jpeg
IEEFA North America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Council on Foreign Relations company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IEEFA North America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IEEFA North America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council on Foreign Relations company.

In the current year, IEEFA North America company and Council on Foreign Relations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IEEFA North America company nor Council on Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IEEFA North America company nor Council on Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IEEFA North America company nor Council on Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations company nor IEEFA North America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IEEFA North America company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Council on Foreign Relations company.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations nor IEEFA North America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References