Comparison Overview

Council on Crime and Justice

VS

Center for Community Alternatives

Council on Crime and Justice

822 South 3rd Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Council on Crime and Justice is an independent, non-profit, 501(C)(3) organization that has been a leader in the field of social and criminal justice in Minnesota since its founding in 1957. Since that time, the Council has been at the forefront of developing new concepts and programs in alternative sanctions, mentor services, victims’ rights, and systems change. The Council pursues and advocates for fair and forward-looking methods to reduce and prevent crime and promote social justice. Our work is about ensuring equal justice and improved public safety at the same time

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Community Alternatives

115 East Jefferson Street, Syracuse, NY, 13202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Center for Community Alternatives (CCA) supports and builds power with people across New York State who have been affected by mass incarceration, criminalization and community disinvestment. Through a statewide network of direct services, advocacy and organizing, and by supporting the leadership of directly-impacted people, we advance civil and human rights for all New Yorkers. CCA works to build a world where everyone has what they need to thrive.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 214
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-crime-and-justice.jpeg
Council on Crime and Justice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-alternatives.jpeg
Center for Community Alternatives
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council on Crime and Justice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Community Alternatives
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council on Crime and Justice in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Community Alternatives in 2025.

Incident History — Council on Crime and Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council on Crime and Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Community Alternatives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Community Alternatives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-crime-and-justice.jpeg
Council on Crime and Justice
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-alternatives.jpeg
Center for Community Alternatives
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Community Alternatives company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Council on Crime and Justice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Community Alternatives company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council on Crime and Justice company.

In the current year, Center for Community Alternatives company and Council on Crime and Justice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Community Alternatives company nor Council on Crime and Justice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Community Alternatives company nor Council on Crime and Justice company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Community Alternatives company nor Council on Crime and Justice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice company nor Center for Community Alternatives company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice company nor Center for Community Alternatives company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Community Alternatives company employs more people globally than Council on Crime and Justice company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council on Crime and Justice nor Center for Community Alternatives holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H