Comparison Overview

Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

VS

One World Fundraising

Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

4940 S 114th St, None, Omaha, Nebraska, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-21

The CINC Foundation represents Nebraska’s leading independent colleges and universities. It’s our job to help raise funds and awareness so everyone understands the economic and personal impact these institutions have on our state and our students. The CINC Foundation brings together the strengths of two previous organizations, the Nebraska Independent College Foundation and the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Nebraska, which previously represented the independent higher education sector in the state for nearly 100 years. The new organization is a 501(c)(3). ​The CINC Foundation’s initial membership includes 13 post-secondary institutions: Bellevue University, Bryan College of Health Sciences, Clarkson College, College of Saint Mary, Concordia University, Creighton University, Doane University, Hastings College, Midland University, Nebraska Methodist College, Nebraska Wesleyan University, Union Adventist University, and York University. Like its members, the Foundation is dedicated to making excellent higher education opportunities accessible to students from diverse backgrounds and communities.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

One World Fundraising

Kemp House, 60 City Road, London, undefined, EC1 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21

One World Fundraising is a face-2-face charity-focused agency which specialises in private site donor acquisition. Our ethos is driven by ethics, quality and core view that globally and individually we have an obligation to provide support for what is around us. We fundraise in every region of the UK, in a residential and roaming context, with a strong emphasis on compliance, as well as enhancing the overall donor experience. Our model reflects one that believes in the concept of charity entirely.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-of-independent-nebraska-colleges-foundation.jpeg
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-world-fundraising.jpeg
One World Fundraising
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
One World Fundraising
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for One World Fundraising in 2025.

Incident History — Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — One World Fundraising (X = Date, Y = Severity)

One World Fundraising cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-of-independent-nebraska-colleges-foundation.jpeg
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-world-fundraising.jpeg
One World Fundraising
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

One World Fundraising company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, One World Fundraising company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company.

In the current year, One World Fundraising company and Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither One World Fundraising company nor Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither One World Fundraising company nor Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither One World Fundraising company nor Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company nor One World Fundraising company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company nor One World Fundraising company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

One World Fundraising company employs more people globally than Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation nor One World Fundraising holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N