Comparison Overview

Council Inc.

VS

The Systemcenter, Inc.

Council Inc.

undefined, San Francisco, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.councildesign.com

As the name suggests, Council was born from the notion of collaboration—its collections reflect the contributions of designers from around the world. We produce singular pieces, and aim to make each one the purest expression of its original design concept. Council’s collection is created for a discerning customer that values quality, craftsmanship, authenticity, and, above all, good design.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Systemcenter, Inc.

1738 SILVA ST, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.systemcenter.com

The Systemcenter, Inc. is a family-owned local business that has been furnishing solutions and spacesaving interiors since July 4, 1976 in Hawaii and the Pacific Rim. We have an experienced in-house team of qualified Market Managers and as well as certified installation/service technicians. The Systemcenter designs and installs Spacesaver compact storage systems and commercial furniture for the healthcare, education, government, business and museum markets. The Systemcenter’s showroom/office and warehouse in Kalihi is a net zero energy facility. We, along with our manufacturers, embrace best environmental practices and ideas of sustainable designs.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-inc..jpeg
Council Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-systemcenter-inc-.jpeg
The Systemcenter, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Systemcenter, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Systemcenter, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Council Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Systemcenter, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Systemcenter, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-inc..jpeg
Council Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-systemcenter-inc-.jpeg
The Systemcenter, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Council Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Systemcenter, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Systemcenter, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council Inc. company.

In the current year, The Systemcenter, Inc. company and Council Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Council Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Council Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Council Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council Inc. company nor The Systemcenter, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Council Inc. company nor The Systemcenter, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Systemcenter, Inc. company employs more people globally than Council Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council Inc. nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References