Comparison Overview

Council for Relationships

VS

East Bay Relationship Center

Council for Relationships

4025 Chestnut St, First Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19104
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.councilforrelationships.org

Council for Relationships is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to help people from all walks of life improve their important relationships by providing exemplary therapy, educating and training clinicians in the family systems approach, and advancing the mental health field through research. More than 70 therapists and psychiatrists provide counseling to individuals, couples, and families in-person at 10 offices and community-based locations in the greater Philadelphia area and online across PA & NJ. Additionally, more than 60 clinical interns per year participating in CFR’s clinician education programs provide counseling on a sliding fee scale. We are committed to providing quality counseling services to all in need, regardless of ability to pay.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

East Bay Relationship Center

4133 Mohr Ave Ste I, Pleasanton, CA 94566, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eastbayrelationshipcenter.com

Providing couples and marriage counseling, family therapy, teen counseling and individual therapy in the Tri-Valley and East Bay area through our offices in Pleasanton & Alameda. About Us We believe that at the core, much of our human distress is caused by relationship "malfunction". All of us have difficulties at times with partners or parents, co-workers or kids, peers, and bosses. You might be in an addictive or unhealthy relationship with a person, a substance or a behavior - we believe these can be transformed. We believe in the great potential of healing relationships. ​ Our mission is to compassionately and effectively work with you to improve or change the relationships you have that are causing you distress. We serve our clients with respect, transparency and consistency. There is no mystery in our approaches to therapy. We value the research-based and evidence-based methods we specialize in. We discuss our approaches with you before beginning treatment and during the course of therapy. It is important that you know the “why” and the “how” of therapy and that it makes sense to you so that you can take this information forward after you leave the therapy room. You have the life experience and desire to make changes; we have the training and specialized knowledge to help you make them.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-relationships.jpeg
Council for Relationships
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bay-relationship-center.jpeg
East Bay Relationship Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council for Relationships
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
East Bay Relationship Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council for Relationships in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East Bay Relationship Center in 2026.

Incident History — Council for Relationships (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council for Relationships cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — East Bay Relationship Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East Bay Relationship Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-relationships.jpeg
Council for Relationships
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bay-relationship-center.jpeg
East Bay Relationship Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

East Bay Relationship Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Council for Relationships company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Council for Relationships company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas East Bay Relationship Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, East Bay Relationship Center company and Council for Relationships company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither East Bay Relationship Center company nor Council for Relationships company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Council for Relationships company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other East Bay Relationship Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither East Bay Relationship Center company nor Council for Relationships company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council for Relationships company nor East Bay Relationship Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Council for Relationships company nor East Bay Relationship Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Council for Relationships company employs more people globally than East Bay Relationship Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council for Relationships nor East Bay Relationship Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References