Comparison Overview

Council for Quality Growth

VS

S&A Strategies

Council for Quality Growth

5901-C Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

The Council for Quality Growth is a not-for-profit trade organization promoting balanced and responsible growth in the metro Atlanta region and state by promoting long range planning and adequate delivery of government services, serving as a catalyst for consensus on growth issues and providing a forum for discussion of responsible development, and economic or technical expertise as needed. Since its inception in 1985, the Council has worked as the development industry’s voice, a clearinghouse for critical information on growth and development policy and a forum for education. The Council advocates for its members to ensure that governmental development policy is fair and conducive to balanced and responsible growth. Through constructive leadership and active participation in resolving growth issues based on real-world experience, the Council is a knowledgeable and informed advocate for you. The Council’s work on behalf of its members has a direct and profitable result on their bottom line. Impact fees, development moratoriums, unrealistic code amendments—it only takes one new regulatory layer and your project becomes unfeasible. The rate of return on your membership investment will prove to be immeasurable as our policy team affects positive change in the political and regulatory web you face daily.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

S&A Strategies

77 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1M2, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

S&A doesn’t just open doors. We’re a hands-on, boutique government relations firm that works closely with leaders and change-makers inside government, businesses, and associations to build relationships, mobilize coalitions, and help shape the policy landscape. We represent big and small enterprises, including Fortune 500 companies, non-profits, private banks and VCs - and we do it across a wide range of industries, including Advanced Manufacturing, AI & Technology, Alcohol & Beverage, the Circular Economy, Economic Development, Electric Vehicle & Supply Chains, Health & Life Sciences, Mining and Sports & Entertainment. We understand the stakeholder map across sectors. And have trusted relationships with pivotal actors and power brokers, enabling us to bridge both divergent and complementary interests and mobilize coalitions of support around key common policy points. We deliver real results for our clients by working effectively inside and outside government channels.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-quality-growth.jpeg
Council for Quality Growth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stosic&associates.jpeg
S&A Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Council for Quality Growth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
S&A Strategies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council for Quality Growth in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&A Strategies in 2025.

Incident History — Council for Quality Growth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council for Quality Growth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — S&A Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&A Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-for-quality-growth.jpeg
Council for Quality Growth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stosic&associates.jpeg
S&A Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Council for Quality Growth company and S&A Strategies company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, S&A Strategies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Council for Quality Growth company.

In the current year, S&A Strategies company and Council for Quality Growth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither S&A Strategies company nor Council for Quality Growth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither S&A Strategies company nor Council for Quality Growth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither S&A Strategies company nor Council for Quality Growth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Council for Quality Growth company nor S&A Strategies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

S&A Strategies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Council for Quality Growth company.

Council for Quality Growth company employs more people globally than S&A Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Council for Quality Growth nor S&A Strategies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N