Comparison Overview

COSI - Center of Science and Industry

VS

Holden Forests & Gardens

COSI - Center of Science and Industry

333 W. Broad Street, None, Columbus, Ohio, US, 43215
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 700 and 749

COSI provides an exciting and informative atmosphere for those of all ages to discover more about our environment, our accomplishments, our heritage, and ourselves. We motivate a desire toward a better understanding of science, industry, health, and history through involvement in exhibits, demonstrations, and a variety of educational activities and experiences. COSI is for the enrichment of the individual and for a more rewarding life on our planet, Earth.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Holden Forests & Gardens

9500 Sperry Road, Kirtland, OH, 44094, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Holden Forests & Gardens is made up of two of Northeast Ohio’s most important environmental and cultural institutions — the Holden Arboretum and Cleveland Botanical Garden — whose mission is to advance and inspire a deeper understanding of plants to enhance life. The 12th largest public garden in the country, Holden Forests & Gardens has more than 17,000 member households and annual attendance of close to 400,000, for whom we strive to provide inspirational and educational visitor experiences. Holden Forests & Gardens is making a positive impact in the region through urban greening and forestry initiatives, environmental research, nature-based educational programs, and world-class visitor experiences at its two campuses. We envision a future in which vibrant green communities and diverse native forests of the Great Lakes region flourish and sustain life.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cosi---center-of-science-and-industry.jpeg
COSI - Center of Science and Industry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-holden-arboretum.jpeg
Holden Forests & Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
COSI - Center of Science and Industry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Holden Forests & Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COSI - Center of Science and Industry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holden Forests & Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — COSI - Center of Science and Industry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COSI - Center of Science and Industry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Holden Forests & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holden Forests & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cosi---center-of-science-and-industry.jpeg
COSI - Center of Science and Industry
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-holden-arboretum.jpeg
Holden Forests & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holden Forests & Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to COSI - Center of Science and Industry company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

COSI - Center of Science and Industry company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Holden Forests & Gardens company has not reported any.

In the current year, Holden Forests & Gardens company and COSI - Center of Science and Industry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Holden Forests & Gardens company nor COSI - Center of Science and Industry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

COSI - Center of Science and Industry company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Holden Forests & Gardens company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Holden Forests & Gardens company nor COSI - Center of Science and Industry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry company nor Holden Forests & Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry company nor Holden Forests & Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

COSI - Center of Science and Industry company employs more people globally than Holden Forests & Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither COSI - Center of Science and Industry nor Holden Forests & Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H