Comparison Overview

Corrigan & Morris LLP

VS

A.B. Data - Incident Response

Corrigan & Morris LLP

12300 Wilshire Blvd. , Los Angeles, California, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CORRIGAN & MORRIS LLP specializes in complex business and securities litigation and SEC enforcement actions. Our attorneys have large firm experience and training, but afford clients the efficiency and responsiveness of a small firm. We have represented and counseled clients in various types of business disputes, including accounting, securities, license agreements, intellectual property, SEC and FINRA regulatory enforcement proceedings. While we typically charge hourly fees, our flexibility allows us to consider alternative fee arrangements, including full or partial contingent fees and stock-based fees.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A.B. Data - Incident Response

600 A.B. Data Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53217, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

A.B. Data is a world-class response services provider. Our experts have decades of experience delivering reliable notification solutions that are tailored to our clients’ individual needs. All services are conducted in-house at our large printing facility and customer contact center. This advantage allows us to offer competitive discounts, to provide speedy communication, and flexibility to make changes throughout the notification process. A.B. Data sends out hundreds of millions of printed and emailed notices annually and handles over 35,000 in-bound calls each year. On average, calls are answered within 30 seconds. Learn more about our services and qualifications by visiting our website.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corrigan-&-morris-llp.jpeg
Corrigan & Morris LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abdata-incident-response.jpeg
A.B. Data - Incident Response
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Corrigan & Morris LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A.B. Data - Incident Response
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corrigan & Morris LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.B. Data - Incident Response in 2025.

Incident History — Corrigan & Morris LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corrigan & Morris LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A.B. Data - Incident Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.B. Data - Incident Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corrigan-&-morris-llp.jpeg
Corrigan & Morris LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abdata-incident-response.jpeg
A.B. Data - Incident Response
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Corrigan & Morris LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A.B. Data - Incident Response company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A.B. Data - Incident Response company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Corrigan & Morris LLP company.

In the current year, A.B. Data - Incident Response company and Corrigan & Morris LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A.B. Data - Incident Response company nor Corrigan & Morris LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A.B. Data - Incident Response company nor Corrigan & Morris LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A.B. Data - Incident Response company nor Corrigan & Morris LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP company nor A.B. Data - Incident Response company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

A.B. Data - Incident Response company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Corrigan & Morris LLP company.

Corrigan & Morris LLP company employs more people globally than A.B. Data - Incident Response company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Corrigan & Morris LLP nor A.B. Data - Incident Response holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X